AMD Ryzen™ 3 1200
- Game performance is controlled by factors including (but not limited to) graphics card performance, network performance, I/O performance, monitor resolution, detail settings and game engine optimization.
- Overclocking AMD processors, including without limitation, altering clock frequencies/multipliers or memory timing/voltage, to operate beyond their stock specifications will void any applicable AMD product warranty, even when such overclocking is enabled via AMD hardware and/or software. This may also void warranties offered by the system manufacturer or retailer. Users assume all risks and liabilities that may arise out of overclocking AMD processors, including, without limitation, failure of or damage to hardware, reduced system performance and/or data loss, corruption or vulnerability. GD-106
* Testing by AMD Performance labs as of July 10, 2017 on the following systems.PC manufacturers may vary configurations yielding different results. Results may vary based on driver versions used. Socket AM4: Ryzen™ 3 1200 processor, B350 Gaming K4 motherboard, with NVIDIA GTX 1080 Ti 8 GB graphics adapter 16GB (2 x 8GB) DDR4-3200 RAM, Windows 10 RS2operating system, Graphics driver 382.53 :: 07/10/2017.
Socket 1151: Z270 SLI, Core i3-7100 processor, B250 Gaming M3 motherboard, with NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti 8GB graphics adapter, 16GB (2 x 8GB) DDR4-2400 RAM, Windows 10 RS2operating system, Graphics driver 382.53 :: 07/10/2017.
Video Encoding: Compared to the Ryzen 3 1200, the Core i3-7100 achieved 85% the video encoding performance in Handbrake. (the Ryzen 3 1200 completed the 1080p video encode in 790 seconds, and the 4K video encode workload in 1528 seconds; the Core i3-7100 completed the 1080p video encode in 927 seconds (927/790=85% as fast as the 1200), and the 4K video encode workload in 1882 seconds (1882/1528=81% as fast as the 1200);The average of 85% and 81% is 83%. Inversely, the Ryzen 3 1200 is up to (100%/83%=120%) 20% faster than the Core i3-7100 at video encoding. Content Creation: Compared to the Ryzen 3 1200, the Core i3-7100 achieved 86% the content creation performance as represented by Cinebench. The Ryzen 3 1200 achieved 486 points, while the Core i3-7100 achieved 416.4 points, 86% the score of the Ryzen 3 1200 (486/416.4=86%). Inversely, the Ryzen 3 1200 is up to (100%/86%=116%) 16% faster than the Core i3-7100 at content creation. 1080p Gaming Performance: Compared to the Ryzen 3 1200, the Core i3-7100 achieved an average frame rate of 110% in The Division; 101% in far Cry Primal; 104% in AOTS (GPU); 104% in AOTS (CPU); 100% in Witcher 3; 102% in Doom; 95% in Overwatch; 104% in Hitman; 89% in DOTA2; 118% in League of Legends; 85% in Playerunknown Battlegrounds; and 107% in Counter Strike: GO; for an average of 102%. Inversely, the Ryzen 3 1200 is up to (100%/102%=98%) 2% slower than the Core i3-7100 at 1080p gaming. RZN-64
** This information represents the views of third parties at http://www.pcgamer.com/amd-ryzen-3-review/ for secure data encryption, and http://hexus.net/tech/reviews/cpu/108073-amd-ryzen-3-1300x-ryzen-3-1200/?page=5 for VR Performance. These third party results have not been verified by AMD. AMD has no obligation to update third party information and will under no circumstances be for any damages resulting from your reliance on this third party content.