AMD Ryzen™ 3 1300X
- AMD’s product warranty does not cover damages caused by overclocking, even when overclocking is enabled via AMD hardware and/or software. GD-26
- Game performance is controlled by factors including (but not limited to) graphics card performance, network performance, I/O performance, monitor resolution, detail settings and game engine optimization.
- AMD Ryzen features and benefits depend on system configuration and may require enabled hardware, software or service activation. Performance varies depending on system configuration. Check with your motherboard and system manufacturer. GD-107
*Testing by AMD Performance labs as of July 10, 2017 on the following systems. PC manufacturers may vary configurations yielding different results. Results may vary based on driver versions used.
Socket AM4: Ryzen™ 3 1300X processor, B350 Gaming K4 motherboard, with NVIDIA GTX 1080 Ti 8 GB graphics adapter 16GB (2 x 8GB) DDR4-3200 RAM, Windows 10 RS2operating system, Graphics driver 382.53 :: 07/10/2017.
Socket 1151: Z270 SLI, Core i3-7300 processor, B250 Gaming M3 motherboard, with NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti 8GB graphics adapter, 16GB (2 x 8GB) DDR4-2400 RAM, Windows 10 RS2operating system, Graphics driver 382.53 :: 07/10/2017.
Video Encoding: Compared to the Ryzen 3 1300X, the Core i3-7300 achieved 75% the video encoding performance in Handbrake. (the Ryzen 3 1300X completed the 1080p video encode in 689 seconds, and the 4K video encode workload in 1330 seconds; the Core i3-7300 completed the 1080p video encode in 901 seconds (689/901=76% as fast as the 1300X), and the 4K video encode workload in 1829 seconds (1330/1829=73% as fast as the 1300X);The average of 73% and 76% is 74.5%, rounded up to 75%. Inversely, the Ryzen 3 1300X is up to (100%/75%=133%) 33% faster than the Core i3-7300 at video encoding.
Content Creation: Compared to the Ryzen 3 1300X, the Core i3-7300 achieved 77% the content creation performance as represented by Cinebench. The Ryzen 3 1300X achieved 561 points, while the Core i3-7300 achieved 433.8 points, 77% the score of the Ryzen 3 1300X (561/433.8=77%). Inversely, the Ryzen 3 1300X is up to (100%/77%=130%) 30% faster than the Core i3-7300 at content creation.
1080p Gaming Performance: Compared to the Ryzen 3 1300X, the Core i3-7300 achieved an average frame rate of 91% in The Division; 96% in far Cry Primal; 101% in AOTS (GPU); 94% in AOTS (CPU); 104% in Witcher 3; 102% in Doom; 89% in Overwatch; 102% in Hitman; 90% in DOTA2; 121% in League of Legends; 96% in Playerunknown Battlegrounds; amd 105% in Counter Strike: GO; for an average of 99%. Inversely, the Ryzen 3 1300X is up to (100%/99%=101%) 1% faster than the Core i3-7300 at 1080p gaming. RZN-63
** This information represents the views of third parties at http://www.pcgamer.com/amd-ryzen-3-review/ for secure data encryption, and http://hexus.net/tech/reviews/cpu/108073-amd-ryzen-3-1300x-ryzen-3-1200/?page=5 for VR Performance. These third party results have not been verified by AMD. AMD has no obligation to update third party information and will under no circumstances be for any damages resulting from your reliance on this third party content.