Environmental Performance Indicators

AMD collects environmental data about AMD locations worldwide and direct manufacturing suppliers representing ~95% of total spend  , while making spend-based assumptions using CEDA factors for the remaining manufacturing and non-manufacturing suppliers. The following table provides data on energy use, electricity consumption, greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, water use, waste generation and compliance. 

We received external limited level assurance in accordance with the International Standard on Assurance Engagements (ISAE) 3000 Revised for 2024 data on our Scope 1 and 2 GHG emissions and related performance against our CR goals, as well as Scope 3 GHG emissions for business travel.

Xilinx and Pensando data from the 2022 acquisitions are incorporated into the 2022 and 2023 metrics below. For 2020 and 2021 data, energy and Scope 1 and 2 GHG data from Xilinx and Pensando are included in support of recalculating base year 2020 and 2021 energy use and related operational GHG emissions.1

n/a = not available 
Values shown in italics represent adjusted data and are different from values shown in previous Corporate Responsibility Reports.

Energy
  2021 2022 2023 2024
Total Absolute Energy Use (GJ) 655,200 748,800 836,902 951,831
Total Absolute Energy Use (GWh) 182 208 233 264
Atlanta 52 n/a n/a n/a
Austin 25 29 32 42
Bengaluru 5 6 9 12
Cyberjaya <1 <1 <1 0
Dublin 7 7 8 7
Hyderabad 1 7 9 12 15
Hyderabad 2 (former Xilinx site) 7 9 10 10
Longmont 14 19 21 23
Markham 27 28 30 31
Milpitas 3 4 n/a n/a
San Jose 27 33 35 34
Santa Clara 8 11 14 19
Shanghai 11 12 14 14
Singapore 1 16 18 21 25
Singapore 2 (former Xilinx site) 13 13 13 14
Other sites combined 6 10 13 17
Electricity (Indirect Energy, GWh) 161 181 203 236
Atlanta 52 n/a n/a n/a
Austin 25 29 32 41
Bengaluru 4 5 8 12
Cyberjaya <1 <1 <1 <1
Dublin 5 5 5 5
Hyderabad 1 7 9 12 15
Hyderabad 2 (former Xilinx site) 7 9 10 10
Longmont 13 17 19 21
Markham 23 24 26 28
Milpitas 3 3 n/a n/a
San Jose 17 18  19 17
Santa Clara 6 7 10 17
Shanghai 11 12 14 14
Singapore 1 16 18 21 25
Singapore 2 (former Xilinx Site) 13 13 13 14
Other sites combined 6 10 14 17
Total Renewable Electricity Use (GWh)3 45 66  94 118
% of Electricity Use Attributed to Renewable Sources 28% 37% 46% 50%
% of Energy Use Attributed to Renewable Sources 25% 32% 40% 44%
Atlanta 02 n/a n/a n/a
Austin 5 4  19 30
Bengaluru 4 5 8 11
Dublin 0 5 5 5
Hyderabad 1 7 9 12 14
Hyderabad 2 (former Xilinx site) 0 9 10 10
Longmont 0 0 0 21
San Jose 17 18  19 4
Shanghai 11 12 14 13
Other 1 4   7 10
Total Non-Renewable Electricity Use (GWh) 116 115 109 118
Total Energy/Revenue (MWh/$USD Millions)4 11.1 8.8 10.3 10.3
Energy Use (Direct, GWh) 21 27 30 29
Atlanta <12 n/a n/a n/a
Austin <1 <1 <1 1
Cyberjaya <1  <1 <1 n/a
Dublin 3 2 3 3
Longmont 2 2 2 2
Markham 4 4 4 4
San Jose5 10 15 16 17
Santa Clara 2 4 4 2
Singapore 1 <1  <1 <1 <1
Singapore 2 (former Xilinx Site) <1 <1 <1 <1
Other sites combined <1 <1 <1 <1
Energy consumption outside of the organization (GJ)6 n/a 210,247,200 214,131,600 209,433,600

 

Greenhouse Gas Emissions

Operational Emissions (Scope 1 and 2)

  2020 2021 2022 2023 2024
Total Scope 1 Emissions7 (mtco2e) 6,412 6,487 8,145 10,008 12,419
Atlanta 43 72 <1 <1 0
Austin 93 60 114 1,724 3,652
Bengaluru 35 111 547 898 447
Boston 0 0 0 100 0
Dublin 708 612 418 664 550
Hyderabad 1 18 22 1,065 960 730
Hyderabad 2 (former Xilinx site) 12 7 32 28 114
Longmont 343 279 579 560 458
Markham 883 926 857 963 909
Milpitas 106 106 106 n/a n/a
San Jose 3,032 2,662 3,396 3,333 4,130
Santa Clara 321 288 378 400 371
Shanghai n/a n/a n/a 0 30
Singapore 1 814 781 124 261 972
Singapore 2 (former Xilinx Site) 5 5 216 116 56
All other sites combined <1 <1 <1 <1 <1
Total Scope 2 Market-based Emissions8 (mtco2e) 55,342 49,391 39,745 36,597 31,771
Atlanta 0 2,1332 n/a n/a n/a
Austin 11,368 8,360 10,076 5,298 4,212
Bengaluru 2,451 0 25  0 330
Cyberjaya 158 108 106 105 124
Dublin 1,299 1,142 2,306 0 0
Hyderabad 1 4,190 0 0 88 304
Hyderabad 2 (former Xilinx site) 4,547 5,096 0 0 110
Longmont 6,800 7,441 9,080 10,119 151
Markham 2,582 2,820 3,001 730 833
Milpitas 563 578 733 n/a n/a
San Jose 5,109 5,147 0 0 3,105
Santa Clara 1,215 1,247 1,799 2,528 3,810
Shanghai 0 0 0 0 451
Singapore 1 6,443 6,300 6,838 8,265 9,493
Singapore 2 (former Xilinx site) 4,805 4,980 3,503 2,367 2,832
All other sites combined 3,812 4,039 2,278 7,097 6,017
Total Scope 1 and 2 Market-based Emissions (mtco2e) 61,754 55,878 47,890 46,606 44,190
Scope 1 and 2 Market-based Emission Reductions9 (% reduction from 2020) n/a 9.5% 22.5% 24.5% 28%
Scope 1 and 2 Market-based Emissions/Revenue (Scope 1 and 2 mtco2e/$USD millions)4 6.3 3.4 2.0 2.0 2.0
Total Scope 2 Location-based Emissions10 (mtco2e) 68,494 70,659 74,479 80,839 91,579
Atlanta 11,183 2,1182 n/a n/a n/a
Austin 10,753 9,820 9,060 11,975 14,299
Bengaluru 2,646 3,084 3,667 5,541 8,520
Cyberjaya n/a n/a n/a 105 124
Hyderabad 1 4,525 4,837 6,124 8,752 10,707
Hyderabad 2 (former Xilinx site) n/a n/a 6,137 7,202 7,443
Longmont 5,669 6,989 9,012 9,897 10,787
Markham 2,743 2,586 2,923 730 833
San Jose n/a n/a 3,776 3,874 2,938
Santa Clara 1,211 1,224 1,800 2,499 3,781
Shanghai 5,929 6,885 7,605 8,426 8,366
Singapore 1 6,483 6,182 6,848 8,265 9,493
Singapore 2 (former Xilinx site) n/a n/a 4,960 4,408 5,424
All other sites combined 17,352 26,934 12,567 9,165 8,863
Total Scope 1 and 2 Location-based Emissions (mtco2e) 74,907 77,148 82,624 90,848 103,998
Scope 1 and 2 Location-based Emissions/Revenue (Scope 1 and 2 mtCO2e/$USD million)4 7.7 4.7 3.5 4.0 4.0

 

Scope 3 Emissions

  2021 2022 2023 2024
Estimated Scope 3 Emissions (mtco2e)11 12,812,872 26,401,535 23,126,774 18,281,832
Category 1: Purchased goods and services 3,744,604 4,019,620 3,909,347 3,950,348
Category 3: Fuel-and energy-related activities (not in Scope 1+2) 14,490 19,750 17,004 12,346
Category 4: Upstream transportation and distribution 61,175 80,947 90,702 92,434
Category 5: Waste generated in operations 41 79 260 331
Category 6: Business travel 671 10,779 13,985 33,467
Category 7: Employee commuting 7,370 33,247 35,052 39,071
Category 11: Use of sold products 8,983,025 22,236,48412 19,059,598 14,152,933
Category 12: End of Life treatment of sold products 1,496 630 825 903
Total Estimated Scope 3 Emissions Per Revenue (mtco2e / USD $ Millions)4 780 1,116 959 709
Other Emissions
  2021 2022 2023 2024
NOx Emissions (metric tco2e) n/a n/a 26 29
SOx Emissions (metric tco2e) n/a n/a 0.6 0.7
GHG-HCFC-22 (metric tco2e) n/a n/a 384 122

 

Water
  2021 2022 2023 2024
Total Water Withdrawal(million liters) 7513 183 225 267
Atlanta 52 n/a n/a n/a
Austin 5 5 14 38
Bengaluru 2 3 5 5
Cyberjaya n/a n/a n/a n/a
Dublin n/a 9 13 10
Hyderabad 3 8 9 10
Hyderabad 2 (former Xilinx site) n/a 4 11 11
Longmont n/a 72 46 76
Markham 24 19 40 26
San Jose n/a 20 26 26
Santa Clara 12 12 18 21
Shanghai 15 14 18 19
Singapore 8 10 9 8
Singapore 2 (former Xilinx site) n/a 6 8 9
Other sites combined <1 1 9 8
Water Use/Revenue (ML/$USD millions)4 0.005 0.008 0.010 0.010
Contract Wafer Manufacturing Water Use (ML)14 11,069 12,657 12,505 11,091
Contract Wafer Manufacturing Water use / Revenue (ML/USD millions)4 0.67 0.54 0.55 0.43
Waste
  2021 2022 2023 2024
Total Non-Hazardous Waste (NHW) Generated (metric tons) 452 785 1,268 1,455
Atlanta n/a2 n/a 2015 6
Austin 163 182 190 186
Bengaluru 2 21 21 49
Dublin n/a 29 45 59
Hyderabad 5 15 46 115
Longmont n/a 55 57 57
Markham 226 211 468 526
San Jose n/a 180 285 303
Santa Clara 28 37 34 59
Singapore 1 23 31 38 54
Singapore 2 (former Xilinx site) n/a 15 25 21
Other sites combined 5 2 39 21
NHW Recycled (metric tons) 383 622 755 784
NHW Landfilled (metric tons) 69 135 461 596
NHW Incinerated (metric tons) n/a 28 29 34
NHW Treated (metric tons) n/a n/a 22 41
NHW Landfill Diversion Rate (%) 85% 83% 63% 57%
Total Hazardous Waste (HW) Generated (metric tons) 4 24 80 108
Austin 2 2 5 7
Bengaluru n/a n/a 1 7
Hyderabad n/a n/a 20 20
Hyderabad 2 (former Xilinx site) n/a 12 2 12
Markham 1 <1 1 1
Santa Clara <1 2 <1 1
Singapore 1 <1 8 50 55
Singapore 2 (former Xilinx site) n/a <1 1 1
Other sites combined n/a <1 <1 6
HW Recycled/Reused (metric tons) <1 12 24 33
Amount of HW waste from manufacturing, % recycle n/a n/a 97% 100%
HW Treated Off-Site (metric tons) 1 8 50 56
HW Incinerated (metric tons) 1 2 3 5
HW Landfilled (metric tons) 2 2 3 5
Total Waste Generated (NHW+HW) (metric tons) 455 809 1,348 1,564
Total Waste Generated per Revenue (metric tons/$USD millions) 0.03 0.03 0.06 0.06
Contract Wafer Manufacturing HW Generated (metric tons)14 44,362 47,018 44,292 60,025
Contract Wafer Manufacturing HW Generated per Revenue (metric tons/$USD millions)4 2.70 1.99 1.95 2.33
Wastewater
  2021 2022 2023 2024
Total Wastewater Discharge[i] (million liters)16 3 16 18 37
Austin 3 3 7 25
Longmont n/a 12 11 12
Wastewater generated per Revenue (ML/$USD Millions)4 0.0002 0.0007 0.0008 0.0015
Compliance
  2021 2022 2023 2024
Number of Environmental Non-Compliances 0 0 117 218
Fines (USD) 0 0 $8,072 $3,000

Social Performance Indicators

The following tables provide annual data on our global workforce including employee diversity, new hires, employee turnover, parental leave, career development, training, well-being and volunteerism.

n/a = not available
Values shown in italics represent adjusted data and are different from values shown in previous Corporate Responsibility Reports.

Global Workforce Data
(Headcount, year-end) 2021 2022 2023 2024
Total Workforce19 22,456 34,648 35,294 39,691
Total Employees 15,503 24,525 25,768 28,343
Temporary Workers and Contractors 6,953 10,123 9,526 11,348
Employees By Region
Americas 8,185 11,989 12,590 13,774
% in Americas 52% 49% 49% 49%
EMEA 389 1,478 1,546 2,003
% in EMEA 3% 6% 6% 7%
Asia-Pacific/China/Japan 6,929 11,058 11,632 12,566
% in Asia-Pacific/China/Japan 45% 45% 45% 44%
Temporary Workers and Contractors by Region
Americas 1,781 2,271 1,977 2,378
% in Americas 26% 22% 20% 21%
EMEA 430 613 721 739
% in EMEA 6% 6% 8% 6.5%
Asia-Pacific/China/Japan 4,742 7,239 6,828 8,231
% in Asia-Pacific/China/Japan 68% 72% 72% 72.5%
Employees by Gender
Male 11,734 18,744 19,703 21,737
% of male 76% 76% 76% 77%
Female 3,769 5,780 6,064 6,605
% of female 24% 24% 24% 23%
Genderqueer n/a 1 1 1
% of genderqueer n/a <1% <1% <1%
Employees by Age Group
iGen(born 1997 or later) 564 1,648 2,346 3,305
% of iGen 4% 7% 9% 12%
Millennials (born 1981-1996) 8,498 13,336 13,973 15,402
% of Millennials 55% 54% 54% 54%
Generation X (born 1965-1980) 5,304 7,930 7,967 8,255
% of GenX 34% 32% 31% 29%
Baby Boomers (born 1946-1964) 1,136 1,610 1,481 1,381
% of Baby Boomers 7% 7% 6% 5%
Traditionalists (born 1927-1945) 1 1 1 0
% of Traditionalist <1% <1% <1% 0%
Employees by Work Status
Full-Time Employees 15,480 24,475 25,726 28,295
% of FTE 99.9% 99.8% 99.8% 99.8%
Part-Time Employees 23 50 42 48
% of PTE <1% <1% <1% <1%

Additional Workforce Disclosures

Gender Pay Gap Report - Xilinx Ireland Unlimited Company

AMD EEO-1 Reports:

Employee Category by Gender
(Headcount, year-end) 2021 2022 2023 2024
AMD Executive Team21
Male 11  13 19 17
% of male 79%  81% 83% 77%
Female 3  3 4 5
% of female 21%  19% 17% 23%
Genderqueer n/a 0 0 0
% of genderqueer n/a 0% 0% 0%
Senior Management22
Male 612 1,217 1,336 1,416
% of male 84% 86% 86% 86%
Female 115 191 219 227
% of female 14% 14% 14% 14%
Genderqueer 0 0 0 0
% of genderqueer 0% 0% 0% 0%
Engineering
Male 10,036 15,854 16,827 18,803
% of male 80% 81% 81% 81%
Female 2,456 3,701 3,980 4,452
% of female 20% 19% 19% 19%
Genderqueer 0 1 1 1
% of genderqueer 0% <1% <1% <1%
Diversity of Board of Directors
(Headcount, year-end) 2021 2022 2023 2024
Total number of Board of Directors 8 9 9 9
Generation X (born 1965-1979)
Total Male 1 1 1 1
% of male 13% 11% 11% 11%
Total Female 1 1 1 1
% of female 13% 11% 11% 11%
Baby Boomers (born 1946-1964)
Total Male 5 5 5 5
% of male 63% 56% 56% 56%
Total Female 1 2 2 2
% of female 13% 22% 22% 22%
Women in Management
(Headcount, year-end) 2022 2023 2024
% of Women in Management n/a 19% 18%
% of Women in Middle Management n/a 20% 19%
% of Women in Non-Managerial Positions n/a 25% 24%
New Employee Hires and Employee Turnover
(Headcount, year-end) 2021 2022 2023 2024
Total New Employee Hires & Acquisitions 4,341 11,278 3,058 4,474
New Hires as % of Prior Year Employee Count 34% 73% 12% 17%
New Hires Distribution by Region
Americas 1,935 4,926 1,488 2,004
% of Americas 45% 44% 49% 45%
EMEA 168 1,199 268 608
% of EMEA 4% 11% 9% 13%
Asia-Pacific/China/Japan 2,238 5,153 1,302 1,862
% of Asia-Pacific/China/Japan 51% 45% 42% 42%
New Hires by Gender
Male 3,246 8,757 2,362 3,453
% of male 75% 78% 77% 77%
Female 1,095 2,520 696 1,021
% of female 25% 22% 23% 23%
Genderqueer 0 1 0 0
% of genderqueer 0% <1% 0% 0%
New Hires by Age Group
iGen (born 1997 or later) 422 1,225 857 1,182
% of iGen 10% 11% 28% 26%
Millennials (born 1981-1996) 2,869 6,269 1,581 2,446
% of Millennials 66% 56% 52% 55%
Generation X (born 1965-1980) 916 3,159 542 769
% of GenX 21% 28% 18% 17%
Baby Boomers (born 1946-1964) 134 625 77 77
% of Baby Boomers 3% 5% 2% 2%
Traditionalists (born 1927-1945) 0 0 1 0
% of Traditionalist 0% 0% <1% 0%
Terminations
Total Terminations 1,472 2,251 1,805 1,892
Total Turnover Rate (%)23 10.6% 10.6% 7.2% 7.0 %
Voluntary Turnover Rate24 (%) 9.5% 9.5% 4.1% 4.3 %
Other Turnover Rate25 1.1% 1.1% 3.1% 2.7 %
Male Voluntary Turnover Rate (%) 9.7% 9.6% 4% 4.2 %
Female Voluntary Turnover Rate (%) 8.7% 9.1% 4.3% 4.5 %
Turnover Rate by Gender
Male 1,157 1,740 1,395 1,430
% of male 11.0% 10.7% 7.3% 6.9 %
Female 315 511 410 462
% of female 9.5% 10.1% 6.9% 7.3 %
Genderqueer 0 0 0 0
% of genderqueer 0% 0% 0% 0%
Turnover Rate by Region
Total in Americas 656 1,146 907 822
Turnover rate (%) in Americas 8.7% 10.8% 7.4% 6.2%
Total in Asia-Pacific/China/Japan 802 995 712 927
Turnover rate (%) in Asia-Pacific/China/Japan 13.2% 10.4% 6.3% 7.6%
Total in Europe/Africa 14 110 186 143
Turnover rate (%) in Europe/Africa 4.8% 10% 12.7% 8.3 %
Total Turnover Rate by Age Group
Total number of iGen (born 1997 or later) 22 141 158 222
Turnover rate (%) of iGen (born 1997 or later) 6.6% 12.3% 7.9% 7.7%
Total number of Millennials (born 1981-1996) 985 1,426 945 1,019
Turnover rate (%) of Millennials (born 1981-1996) 13.3% 12.3% 7% 6.9%
Total number of Generation X (born 1965-1980) 344 533 498 475
Turnover rate (%) of Generation X (born 1965-1980) 6.9% 7.6% 6.3% 5.8%
Total number of Baby Boomers (born 1946-1964) 120 151 203 175
Turnover rate (%) of Baby Boomers (born 1946-1964) 10.5% 10.2% 13.1% 12.1%
Total number of Traditionalists (born 1927-1945) 1 0 1 1
Parental Leave26
(Headcount, year-end) 2021 2022 2023 2024
Employees that were entitled to parental leave27
Male 11,734 18,770 19,704 21,740
Female 3,769 5,759 6,063 6,604
Genderqueer 0 0 1 1
Total 15,503 24,529 25,768 28,345
Employees that took parental leave
Male 200 549 950 1,025
Female 227 304 485 519
Genderqueer 0 0 0 0
Total 427 853 1,435 1,544
Employees that returned to work in the reporting period after parental leave  
Male 187 531 896 977
Female 206 239 397 504
Genderqueer 0 0 0 0
Total 393 770 1,293 1,481
Employees that returned to work after parental leave ended that were still employed 12 months after their return to work
Male 183 507 880 947
Female 199 229 391 486
Genderqueer 0 0 0 0
Total 382 736 1,271 1,433
Return to work rates of employees that took parental leave (%)
Male return to work rate (%) 94% 97% 94% 95%
Female return to work rate (%) 91% 79% 82% 97%
Genderqueer return to work rate (%) 0% 0% 0% 0%
Total return to work rate (%) 92% 90% 90% 96%
Retention rates of employees that took parental leave (%)
Male retention rate (%) 92% 92% 93% 92%
Female retention rate (%) 88% 75% 81% 94%
Genderqueer retention rate (%) 0% 0% 0% 0%
Total retention rate (%) 89% 86% 89% 93%
Performance and Career Development28
(Headcount, year-end) 2021 2022 2023 2024
Employees by gender who received a regular performance review during the reporting period.
% of male 98.7% 100% 100% 100%
% of female 98.2% 100% 100% 100%
% of genderqueer 0% 100% 100% 100%
Employees by employee category29 who received a regular performance review during the reporting period.
% of Executive 92.8% 100% 100% 100%
% of Managers 99.4% 100% 100% 100%
% of Technical Staff 99.0% 100% 100% 100%
% of Staff 98.6% 100% 100% 100%
Minimum Wage30
Annual Salary (USD) 20221 2023 2024
Lowest U.S. entry-level wage $35,292 $38,468 $40,103
Training and Education
(Headcount, year-end) 2022 2023 2024
Total hours of employee training 178,944 156,561 166,994
Average hours of training per year per employee 7.3 6 5.9
% of the total employees across all locations who received career or skills-related training31 n/a 26% 23%
% of the total workforce across all locations who received training (internally or externally) on environmental issues32 n/a 67% 75%
AMDer Survey
(Headcount, year-end) 2021 2022 2023 2024
% of employees that responded 96% 96% 95% 93%
I am proud to work for AMD (% favorable) 94% 92% 91% 91%
I would recommend AMD as a great place to work (% favorable) 86% 86% 83% 88%
AMD creates an environment where people of diverse backgrounds can succeed (% favorable) 92% 92% 92% 92%
Engagement Index (% favorable) 86% 86% 86% 86%
Belonging and Inclusion Index (% favorable) 90% 90% 89% 91%
Manager Quality Index (% favorable) 88% 89% 88% 87%
Well-Being33
  2021 2022 2023 2024
Number of Recordable Combined Injury and Illness Cases 8 12 14 10
Rate of Recordable Combined Injury and Illness Cases (per 200,000 work hours) 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.03
Number of Recordable Injury Cases 4 3 14 10
Rate of Recordable Injury Cases (per 200,000 work hours) 0.02 0.01 0.04 0.03
Number of Recordable Employee Injury Cases 4 2 11 10
Rate of Recordable Employee Injury Cases (per 200,000 work hours) n/a n/a n/a 0.03
Number of Recordable Contractor Injury Cases 0 1 3 0
Rate of Contractor Recordable Injury Cases (per 200,000 work hours) n/a n/a n/a 0
Number of Recordable Illness Cases 4 9 0 0
Rate of Recordable Illness Cases (per 200,000 work hours) 0.02 0.03 0 0
Number of Recordable Employee Illness Cases 2 9 0 0
Number of Recordable Contractor Illness Cases 2 0 0 0
Number of Employee Work-Related Fatalities 0 0 0 0
Number of Contractor Work-Related Fatalities 0 0 0 0
Number of Combined Employee and Contractor Work-Related Fatalities 0 0 0 0
Rate of Combined Employee and Contractor Work-related Fatalities (per 200,000 work hours) 0 0 0 0
Number of Employee High-Consequence Work-Related Injuries (excluding fatalities) 0 0 0 0
Rate of Employee High-Consequence Work-Related Injuries (excluding fatalities) (per 200,000 work hours) 0 0 0 0
Number of Contractor High-Consequence Work-Related Injuries (excluding fatalities) 0 0 0 0
Rate of Contractor High-Consequence Work-Related Injuries (excluding fatalities) (per 200,000 work hours) 0 0 0 0
Rate of Combined Employee and Contractor High-Consequence Work-Related Injuries (excluding fatalities) (per 200,000 work hours) 0 0 0 0
Number of Days Lost Due to Employee Injuries n/a n/a n/a 33
Lost Time Injury (LTI) Severity Rate for Employees (per 1,000) n/a n/a n/a 0
Number of Days Lost Due to Contractor Injuries n/a n/a n/a 0
Lost Time Injury (LTI) Severity Rate for Contractors (per 1,000) n/a n/a n/a 0
Total Number of Hours Worked 38,583,384 59,955,000 74,238,696 66,313,704
Number of Employee Hours Worked n/a n/a n/a 60,007,176
Number of Contractor Hours Worked n/a n/a n/a 6,306,528
Total Lost Time Events n/a n/a n/a 1
Number of Employee Lost Time Events n/a n/a n/a 1
Number of Contractor Lost Time Events n/a n/a n/a 0
Employee Lost Time Injury (LTI) Frequency Rate (per 1,000,000) n/a n/a n/a 0.02
Contractor Lost Time Injury (LTI) Frequency Rate (per 1,000,000) n/a n/a n/a 0
Number of Health or Safety Non-Compliances 134 135 336 137
% of the total workforce represented in joint management-worker health and safety committees n/a n/a 28% 29.5%
Total amount of monetary losses as a result of legal proceedings associated with employee health and safety violations n/a n/a $0 $0
% of AMD Managed Sites for which an EHS risk assessment has been conducted n/a n/a 30% 44%
Volunteerism38
  2021 2022 2023 2024
AMD Volunteers 2,807 4,977 5,720 8,178
AMD Volunteer Hours 9,052 17,244 25,368 33,388
Number of Volunteer Events 64 162 288 358
Number of Employee Donors n/a 1,888 4,167 6,424

Economic Performance Indicators

The following tables provide information about our company’s annual financial data, social investments and U.S. political activities.

n/a = not available
Values shown in italics represent adjusted data and are different from values shown in previous Corporate Responsibility Reports.

Financial Data39
  2021 2022 2023 2024
Total Revenue (millions USD) $16,434 $23,601 $22,680 $25,785
Operating Expense (millions USD) $4,293 $9,441 $10,093 $10,873
Community Investments
  2021 2022 2023 2024
By Type
AMD Foundation - Charitable Grants (USD) $32,500 $101,388 $10,000 $400,000
Cash and In-Kind Giving (USD) $1,814,847 $5,042,084 $5,020,122 $6,845,327
Matching Gift and Volunteer Reward (USD) n/a $961,178 $1,689,672 $1,758,312
Total (USD) $1,847,347 $6,104,650 $6,719,794 $9,003,639
By Region40
Total Americas (USD) $1,205,217 $3,715,629 $2,908,785 $5,211,578
Total Europe/Africa (USD) $156,935 $990,436 $906,152 $1,387,400
Total Asia-Pacific/Greater China/India (USD) $485,195 $437,408 $1,215,185 $646,348
By Focus Area40
Total Education (USD) $294,172 $678,860 $923,910 $1,454,393
Total Disaster relief and humanitarian aid (USD) $125,000 $135,500 $0 $52,632
Total Social Services (USD) $445,077 $224,126 $376,544 $339,421
Total Scientific Research (USD) $955,653 $4,040,005 $3,643,973 $5,291,014
Total Environment (USD) $27,445 $64,982 $85,695 $107,867
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. Political Action Committee (PAC)41
  2021 2022 2023 2024
Total Contributions (USD) $11,250 $36,500 $33,000 $82,120
Total Receipts (USD) $31,000 $62,465 $6,000 $37,500
각주
  1. 2020 and 2021 data includes energy use and Scope 1 and 2 GHG emission data from Xilinx and Pensando in order to reset the 2020 GHG goal baseline per the GHG Protocol, but does not include other data (i.e., water, waste) from the acquisitions in those years. All 2022 and later year environmental metrics include Xilinx and Pensando data. 
  2. AMD migrated US data center operations near Atlanta to a third-party operated, collocated facility .
  3. AMD sources renewable energy through utility providers (green tariffs), and sellers of third-party certified renewable energy credits (RECs), as well as generates renewable energy onsite
  4. For financial intensity metrics, AMD reports the environmental metric and divides by the corresponding year annual revenue (in millions of USD). Energy use is MWh of energy per $1M USD revenue, and the 2020 and 2021 revenue reflects AMD prior to the acquisitions although energy use is included from the acquisitions due to the 2020 base year reset for our GHG reduction goal.  Emissions financial intensity is metric tCO2e per $1M USD in revenue, shown both for location-based and market-based scope 2 emissions. Water use and wastewater discharge are reported as millions of liters of water used or discharged per $1M USD in revenue. 
  5. San Jose has fuel cells that convert diesel into electricity. The emissions related to the fuel cells are reported under Scope 1. The site also generates renewable energy onsite, which is included in the site electricity use but assigned a zero emission factor. 
  6. AMD reported data for “Energy outside of the organization” includes purchased goods and services (category 1) and use of goods sold (category 11). 
  7. AMD follows the GHG Protocol for Scope 1 emission estimates, the internationally recognized standard for the corporate accounting and reporting of GHG emissions. Scope 1 emissions factors estimated based on quantity of refrigerants and fuel consumed in each geography, including natural gas and refrigerants such as hexafluoroethane (HFE) and hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs). The scope is based on operational control (i.e., AMD occupied facilities) and the method includes Site Metrics Coordinators entering the monthly amount of fuel and chemicals use, by type, into AMD’s central database, and then applying the emission factors. Emission factors were obtained from three main sources: DESNZ 2024 (previously referred to as DEFRA or UK BEIS in previous documents), IPCC AR6 (6th Assessment Report) or US EPA Fluorinated GHG Report.) Values have undergone third-party limited assurance.
  8. AMD follows the GHG Protocol for Scope 2 emission estimates by multiplying the quantity of electricity consumed at each site by relevant emission factors. If electricity use data is not available, as for small offices, then an average value for U.S. office buildings is used for all AMD locations (16.9 kWh/sq ft) based on EIA CBECS results for the average administrative office, and the emission factor for the location is applied. AMD applies both the market-based and location-based methods for estimating scope 2 emissions. Market-based emission calculations are based on grid electricity use excluding renewable energy sourced through green tariffs and renewable energy credits (RECs) allocated to each site. Location-based emission calculations are based on the quantity of grid electricity used plus renewable energy sourced through utility “green tariff” programs. Emission factors for locations in the U.S. are based on eGRID and Green-e 2023 databases. Location-based electricity emission factors for Canada are provided in the 2024 Canada NIR report, specific to each Canadian province. Market-based emission factors for Europe were taken from the IEA 2024 emission factor database. Location-based emission factors for all countries other than the US and Canada were taken from the IEA 2024 emission factor database. 2020-24 values have undergone third-party limited assurance.
  9. Our goal is a 50 percent reduction in absolute Scope 1 and 2 GHG emissions from 2020-2030.
  10. Some site location-based GHG emission values for Xilinx and Pensando sites in 2020-21, prior to acquisition by AMD, are estimates under 'other site' approximations.
  11. In 2021, AMD expanded the estimations for scope 3 reporting, thereby notably increasing total values reported those years. Our value chain emissions are estimated following the guidance from the GHG protocol. Category 1: Emissions are calculated by directly surveying suppliers representing ~95% of our total supply chain spend (includes Foundry, final test/assembly, substrates). It includes their estimated allocations to AMD (typically using revenue-based accounting), at a factory level where available, for their Scope 1 and 2 emissions, as well as upstream Scope 3 if available. For Foundries, we used a third-party life cycle assessment to estimate upstream emissions. For other suppliers we apply a spend-based method by mapping spend categories to the associated Scope 3 CEDA emission factor. Emissions from all other vendors (including marketing, professional services, real estate, software providers, telecom and networking providers and other manufacturing services) are calculated using a spend-based method. Category 2: Calculated following a spend-based method and are included in the disclosed figure in Category 1. Category 3: Emissions are calculated using fuel and electricity consumption data collected from our sites globally, and Well-to-tank (WTT) emission factors for natural gas and diesel were obtained from the DEFRA 2024 Conversion Factors database. Emission factors for transmission & distribution-related electricity losses, and electricity-related WTT generation and transmission and distribution, were obtained from the IEA Emission Factors 2024 database and the IPCC AR5 report. Category 4: emissions are estimated using a hybrid methodology combining supplier-specific emissions reported by two of our major shipping providers and a mode-specific, spend-based calculation on all other logistics spend. Category 5: Waste data is collected from our sites globally. End-of-life, disposal method-specific emissions factors were obtained from the 2024 DESNZ Conversion Factors database. A recycling emission factor was obtained from the 2021 DESNZ Conversion Factors database. Category 6: Emissions were calculated in accordance with the GHG Protocol based on commercial and private jet air travel data and spend data provided by our travel agencies. Flights were categorized as either short-, medium-, or long-haul and the appropriate DESNZ 2024 factors are applied. For car rental and train travel, we used spend-based estimates from the CEDA 5.0 EEIO database. Category 7: Emissions are based on 2025 employee survey data. Offices were split into geographic regions, and commuting benchmarks were calculated per these regions (EMEA, North America, South Asia, East Asia/Southeast Asia.) The commuting modes were cycling/biking, van transport, public transport, and driving alone. Public transport was assumed to be a mix of train and bus travel, as determined by regional benchmarks outlined in the commuting tool descriptions below. All employees were assumed to work 250 days with an assumption applied for full time onsite versus part time (hybrid) versus remote.  Data for 2021-2023 included the~10 largest campuses whereas 2024 included all employees globally. Category 11: Emissions are calculated based on total sales volume, average product electricity consumption, and average product lifetime split by product category for products sold in the reporting year. Emissions were calculated by multiplying total energy consumption by the corresponding country-level emission factor from IEA 2024. A percentage of data center-related products are assumed to be powered with renewable electricity based on public reporting from our customers. Since 2022, data has included Xilinx products. Category 12: Emissions are calculated based on the average product weight by product category and the total sales volume within the reporting year. A weight-based calculation is used, with the disposal method estimated using region-specific e-waste disposal benchmarks obtained from the Global e-Waste Statistics Partnership (2024). Region-specific waste disposal benchmarks obtained from the World Bank. Disposal type-specific emission factors obtained from the EPA GHG Emission Factor Hub (2024). Region-specific blended average waste disposal emission factors were calculated using waste disposal benchmarks.
  12. In 2023, AMD restated estimated 2022 product use and end of use estimates (Scope 3 categories 11 and 12) to include Xilinx and Pensando data following 2022 acquisitions.
  13. The low water use in 2021 was attributed to several factors including having fewer employees on-site due to COVID-19 protocols.
  14. AMD receives estimated data on from our primary wafer foundries on energy use, GHG emissions, water use, hazardous and non-hazardous waste attributed to the manufacturing of AMD products.
  15. AMD moved its data center operations from Atlanta in 2021 to a collocated facility but decommissioned server and other equipment in 2023 and 2024. 
  16. AMD generates a limited amount of wastewater that requires treatment by the municipal wastewater treatment plant, in accordance with water quality permitting.
  17. On 12/14/2023, the City of Markham performed an unannounced McNabb construction site visit and notified AMD of a failure to meet the “Tree Preservation By-Law.” An approved permit and protection barriers were needed prior to beginning outdoor work laying conduit and the construction contractors failed to comply. The City required an arborist to inspect the trees and provide a tree impact report. The arborist, hired by the construction company (DPI), came to the site on 12/16/2203 and provided a report to the City which stated that three trees (each 14 inch+ in diameter) were severely damaged and will need to be removed. The City required AMD to remove the three trees by Jan 31, 2024, and gave an option of planting 18 trees or pay a fine of USD$10,800 (USD$600 for each tree not planted) by May 31, 2024. An arborist (hired by DPI) removed the trees on January 24, 2024. After discussion with the property owner, AMD opted to replace three trees and pay cash in lieu for fifteen. Action of tree removal was confirmed by the City on January 26, 2024, and cash in lieu on April 17, 2024. The City confirmed compliance via email on May 9, 2024.
  18. A stormwater inspection at San Jose found two environmental issues related to outdoor cleaning which were quickly fixed and a follow-up inspection confirmed all concerns were resolved. A notice of violation and a USD$3,000 settlement offer were received from the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board regarding a xylene exceedance in groundwater associated with the AMD Superfund site. Despite evidence that there was no bypass, violation or unauthorized discharge, AMD decided not to contest the violation and paid the fine. An inspection by the San Jose Fire Department noted missing signage. Temporary signs were placed during the inspection and permanent signs were installed shortly thereafter.
  19. Reported data includes AMD employees, temporary workers and contractors.
  20. Genderqueer was added as a new category for employees to self-identify gender beginning in 2022.
  21. AMD Executive Leadership Team (c-suite).
  22. Includes People Managers that are in the Director or Fellow level positions and above. Reported employee data exclude unknown gender.
  23. Number of total terminations divided by the average monthly regular headcount throughout the year.
  24. Voluntary terminations are defined as the number of regular employees leaving AMD voluntarily, excluding retirements.
  25. Other turnover rate (%) is defined as the number of other terminations divided by the average monthly regular headcount throughout the year. Other termination reasons include involuntary, RIF, death, and retirement.
  26. Based on employees who were on LOA Parental / Maternity with a start date in that year and if returned to work after the LOA end date (with Voluntary or Family reasons). Reported data is for AMD employees. 
  27. AMD offers paid parental leave globally to its FTE employees. “Parental leave” can encompass various types of leaves in different countries; it provides time off for parents to nurture their families and make necessary life adjustments.
  28. Includes AMD employees hired on or before September 30th of the reporting year.
  29. Employee categories are defined as Executive: Director level positions and above; Manager: Manager and Senior Manager Job Titles; Technical Staff: Member of Technical Staff through Corporate Fellow; Professional: Supervisor positions; and Staff: Employees from Junior level positions to Professional.
  30. AMD employee base pay is benchmarked to the competitive high-tech market of companies our size, with our midpoint targets at or above the median of the market.
  31. Reported value is based on the total number of employees across all locations who received career- or skills-related instructor led training - excluding compliance, functional specific, or eLearning trainings.
  32. Reported value is calculated based on the number of employees that complete the AMD Global HSSE Workplace Orientation training during the reporting period.
  33. The reported data includes AMD employees and contract workers who report directly to an AMD employee. Our reporting guidelines are based on OSHA reporting criteria. Minor (first aid level) injuries are not included. Lost days are calculated based on scheduled workdays. The scope of our wellbeing (health and Safety) reporting was expanded in 2024 to include additional metrics and categories. Consequently, some data for prior years is not available for comparison.  
  34. On April 28, 2021, a Notice of Violation was received from the Austin Fire Department for a small site in Austin. Two deficiencies were noted, one for the failure of a heat detector and the other for inability to inspect two other detectors. All corrective actions were completed, and the site was back in compliance on May 4, 2021.
  35. A missing placard was identified during a San Jose Fire Department hazardous materials inspection at the San Jose site. A placard was posted, and the agency confirmed the violation was resolved.
  36. California Department of Public Health issued an NOV on July 6, 2023, for missing signage on X-ray equipment at the San Jose site. Signs were added and NOV was closed on Aug 8, 2023. The San Jose Fire Department issued two NOVs in November 2023 for delayed submittal of fire alarm inspections. The information was submitted, and the NOV was closed on December 1, 2023.
  37. An inspection by the San Jose Fire Department noted missing signage. Temporary signs were placed during the inspection and permanent signs were installed shortly thereafter.
  38. Reported data includes AMD employees and contractors.
  39. Economic data for current and past years are updated annually to reflect the company’s most recent financial reports.
  40. Reported data by region and focus area excludes Matching Gift and Volunteer Rewards.
  41. The AMD PAC is 100% funded by personal contributions from eligible donors, which include certain employees and their spouses, and is used to support candidates running for public office. AMD cannot, and does not, make any direct or indirect financial contributions to federal political candidates or committees. Totals of U.S. contributions and receipts associated with the AMD PAC are available on the U.S. Federal Election Commission website. Additional information on AMD Public Policy Engagement and U.S. Political Activities can be found here: https://www.amd.com/en/corporate/corporate-responsibility/governance/public-policy-engagement.html.