Global Workforce Data
(Headcount, year-end) |
2020 |
2021 |
20221 |
2023 |
Total Workforce2 |
18,376 |
22,456 |
34,648 |
35,294 |
Total Employees |
12,637 |
15,503 |
24,525 |
25,768 |
Temporary Workers and Contractors |
5,739 |
6,953 |
10,123 |
9,526 |
Employees By Region |
|
|
|
|
Americas |
6,904 |
8,185 |
11,989 |
12,590 |
% in Americas |
55% |
52% |
49% |
49% |
EMEA |
233 |
389 |
1,478 |
1,546 |
% in EMEA |
2% |
3% |
6% |
6% |
Asia-Pacific/China/Japan |
5,500 |
6,929 |
11,058 |
11,632 |
% in Asia-Pacific/China/Japan |
43% |
45% |
45% |
45% |
Temporary Workers and Contractors by Region |
|
|
|
|
Americas |
1,633 |
1,781 |
2,271 |
1,977 |
% in Americas |
28% |
26% |
22% |
20% |
EMEA |
393 |
430 |
613 |
721 |
% in EMEA |
7% |
6% |
6% |
8% |
Asia-Pacific/China/Japan |
3,713 |
4,742 |
7,239 |
6,828 |
% in Asia-Pacific/China/Japan |
65% |
68% |
72% |
72% |
Employees by Gender3 |
|
|
|
|
Male |
9,624 |
11,734 |
18,744 |
19,703 |
% of male |
76% |
76% |
76% |
76% |
Female |
2,989 |
3,769 |
5,780 |
6,064 |
% of female |
24% |
24% |
24% |
24% |
Genderqueer4 |
n/a |
n/a |
1 |
1 |
% of genderqueer |
n/a |
n/a |
<1% |
<1% |
Employees by Age Group |
|
|
|
|
iGen (born 1997 or later) |
164 |
564 |
1,648 |
2,346 |
% of iGen |
1% |
4% |
7% |
9% |
Millennials (born 1981-1996) |
6,614 |
8,498 |
13,336 |
13,973 |
% of Millennials |
52% |
55% |
54% |
54% |
Generation X (born 1965-1980) |
4,734 |
5,304 |
7,930 |
7,967 |
% of GenX |
37% |
34% |
32% |
31% |
Baby Boomers (born 1946-1964) |
1,123 |
1,136 |
1,610 |
1,481 |
% of Baby Boomers |
9% |
7% |
7% |
6% |
Traditionalists (born 1927-1945) |
2 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
% of Traditionalist |
<1% |
<1% |
<1% |
<1% |
Employees by Work Status |
|
|
|
|
Full-Time Employees |
12,619 |
15,480 |
24,475 |
25,726 |
% of FTE |
99.9% |
99.9% |
99.8% |
99.8% |
Part-Time Employees |
18 |
23 |
50 |
42 |
% of PTE |
<1% |
<1% |
<1% |
<1% |
Additional Workforce Disclosures
Gender Pay Gap Report - Xilinx Ireland Unlimited Company ("AMD")
Xilinx Ireland Unlimited Company is a subsidiary of Xilinx, Inc. and Xilinx Inc. was acquired by Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (AMD) in February 2022
AMD EEO-1 Reports:
Employee Category by Gender
(Headcount, year-end) |
2020 |
2021 |
20221 |
2023 |
AMD Executive Team 5 |
|
|
|
|
Male |
10 |
11 |
13 |
19 |
% of male |
77% |
79% |
81% |
83% |
Female |
3 |
3 |
3 |
4 |
% of female |
23% |
21% |
19% |
17% |
Genderqueer |
n/a |
n/a |
0 |
0 |
% of genderqueer |
n/a |
n/a |
0% |
0% |
Senior Management6 |
|
|
|
|
Male |
517 |
612 |
1,217 |
1,336 |
% of male |
84% |
84% |
86% |
86% |
Female |
95 |
115 |
191 |
219 |
% of female |
14% |
14% |
14% |
14% |
Genderqueer |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
% of genderqueer |
0% |
0% |
0% |
0% |
Engineering |
|
|
|
|
Male |
8,260 |
10,036 |
15,854 |
16,827 |
% of male |
81% |
80% |
81% |
81% |
Female |
1,883 |
2,456 |
3,701 |
3,980 |
% of female |
19% |
20% |
19% |
19% |
Genderqueer |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
% of genderqueer |
0% |
0% |
<1% |
<1% |
Diversity of Board of Directors
(Headcount, year-end) |
2020 |
2021 |
20221 |
2023 |
Total number of Board of Directors |
8 |
8 |
9 |
9 |
Generation X (born 1965-1979) |
|
|
|
|
Total Male |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
% of male |
13% |
13% |
11% |
11% |
Total Female |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
% of female |
13% |
13% |
11% |
11% |
Baby Boomers (born 1946-1964) |
|
|
|
|
Total Male |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
% of male |
63% |
63% |
56% |
56% |
Total Female |
1 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
% of female |
13% |
13% |
22% |
22% |
Women in Management
(Headcount, year-end) |
2020 |
2021 |
2022 |
2023 |
% of Women in Management |
n/a |
n/a |
n/a |
19% |
% of Women in Middle Management |
n/a |
n/a |
n/a |
20% |
% of Women in Non-Managerial Positions |
n/a |
n/a |
n/a |
25% |
% of Women Promoted of Total Promotions |
n/a |
n/a |
n/a |
22% |
New Employee Hires and Employee Turnover
(Headcount, year-end) |
2020 |
2021 |
20221 |
2023 |
Total New Employee Hires & Acquisitions |
1,996 |
4,341 |
11,278 |
3,058 |
New Hires as % of Prior Year Employee Count |
17% |
34% |
73% |
12% |
New Hires Distribution by Region |
|
|
|
|
Americas |
1,059 |
1,935 |
4,926 |
1,488 |
% of Americas |
53% |
45% |
44% |
49% |
EMEA |
47 |
168 |
1,199 |
268 |
% of EMEA |
2% |
4% |
11% |
9% |
Asia-Pacific/China/Japan |
890 |
2,238 |
5,153 |
1,302 |
% of Asia-Pacific/China/Japan |
45% |
51% |
45% |
42% |
New Hires by Gender3 |
|
|
|
|
Male |
1,567 |
3,246 |
8,757 |
2,362 |
% of male |
79% |
75% |
78% |
77% |
Female |
424 |
1,095 |
2,520 |
696 |
% of female |
21% |
25% |
22% |
23% |
Genderqueer |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
% of genderqueer |
0% |
0% |
<1% |
0% |
New Hires by Age Group |
|
|
|
|
iGen (born 1997 or later) |
133 |
422 |
1,225 |
857 |
% of iGen |
7% |
10% |
11% |
28% |
Millennials (born 1981-1996) |
1,261 |
2,869 |
6,269 |
1,581 |
% of Millennials |
63% |
66% |
56% |
52% |
Generation X (born 1965-1980) |
516 |
916 |
3,159 |
542 |
% of GenX |
26% |
21% |
28% |
18% |
Baby Boomers (born 1946-1964) |
86 |
134 |
625 |
77 |
% of Baby Boomers |
4% |
3% |
5% |
2% |
Traditionalists (born 1927-1945) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
% of Traditionalist |
0% |
0% |
0% |
<1% |
Terminations |
|
|
|
|
Total Terminations |
778 |
1,472 |
2,251 |
1,805 |
Total Turnover Rate (%)7 |
6.5% |
10.6% |
10.6% |
7.2% |
Voluntary Turnover8 Rate (%) |
5.5% |
9.5% |
9.5% |
4.1% |
Other Turnover Rate9 |
1% |
1.1% |
1.1% |
3.1% |
Male Voluntary Turnover Rate (%) |
5.6% |
9.7% |
9.6% |
4% |
Female Voluntary Turnover Rate (%) |
4.9% |
8.7% |
9.1% |
4.3% |
Turnover Rate by Gender3 |
|
|
|
|
Male |
616 |
1,157 |
1,740 |
1,395 |
% of male |
6.7% |
11.0% |
10.7% |
7.3% |
Female |
162 |
315 |
511 |
410 |
% of female |
5.7% |
9.5% |
10.1% |
6.9% |
Genderqueer |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
% of genderqueer |
0% |
0% |
0% |
0% |
Turnover Rate by Region |
|
|
|
|
Total in Americas |
378 |
656 |
1,146 |
907 |
Turnover rate (%) in Americas |
5.8% |
8.7% |
10.8% |
7.4% |
Total in Asia-Pacific/China/Japan |
387 |
802 |
995 |
712 |
Turnover rate (%) in Asia-Pacific/China/Japan |
7.3% |
13.2% |
10.4% |
6.3% |
Total in Europe/Africa |
13 |
14 |
110 |
186 |
Turnover rate (%) in Europe/Africa |
6.1% |
4.8% |
10% |
12.7% |
Total Turnover Rate by Age Group |
|
|
|
|
Total number of iGen (born 1997 or later) |
2 |
22 |
141 |
158 |
Turnover rate (%) of iGen (born 1997 or later) |
2.1% |
6.6% |
12.3% |
7.9% |
Total number of Millennials (born 1981-1996) |
482 |
985 |
1,426 |
945 |
Turnover rate (%) of Millennials (born 1981-1996) |
7.7% |
13.3% |
12.3% |
7% |
Total number of Generation X (born 1965-1980) |
214 |
344 |
533 |
498 |
Turnover rate (%) of Generation X (born 1965-1980) |
4.7% |
6.9% |
7.6% |
6.3% |
Total number of Baby Boomers (born 1946-1964) |
80 |
120 |
151 |
203 |
Turnover rate (%) of Baby Boomers (born 1946-1964) |
7.1% |
10.5% |
10.2% |
13.1% |
Total number of Traditionalists (born 1927-1945) |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
Turnover rate (%) of Traditionalists (born 1927-1945) |
0% |
66.7% |
0% |
>1% |
Parental Leave10
(Headcount, year-end) |
2020 |
2021 |
20221 |
2023 |
Employees that were entitled to parental leave11 |
||||
Male |
9,333 |
11,734 |
18,770 |
19,704 |
Female |
2,965 |
3,769 |
5,759 |
6,063 |
Genderqueer |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
Total |
12,298 |
15,503 |
24,529 |
25,768 |
Employees that took parental leave |
||||
Male |
403 |
200 |
549 |
950 |
Female |
183 |
227 |
304 |
485 |
Genderqueer |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Total |
586 |
427 |
853 |
1,435 |
Employees that returned to work in the reporting period after parental leave |
||||
Male |
376 |
187 |
531 |
896 |
Female |
163 |
206 |
239 |
397 |
Genderqueer |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Total |
539 |
393 |
770 |
1,293 |
Employees that returned to work after parental leave ended that were still employed 12 months after their return to work |
||||
Male |
363 |
183 |
507 |
880 |
Female |
161 |
199 |
229 |
391 |
Genderqueer |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Total |
524 |
382 |
736 |
1,271 |
Return to work rates of employees that took parental leave (%) |
||||
Male return to work rate (%) |
93% |
94% |
97% |
94% |
Female return to work rate (%) |
89% |
91% |
79% |
82% |
Genderqueer return to work rate (%) |
0% |
0% |
0% |
0 |
| Total return to work rate (%) | 92% |
92% |
90% |
90% |
Retention rates of employees that took parental leave (%) |
||||
Male retention rate (%) |
90% |
92% |
92% |
93% |
Female retention rate (%) |
88% |
88% |
75% |
81% |
Genderqueer retention rate (%) |
0% |
0% |
0% |
0% |
Total retention rate (%) |
89% |
89% |
86% |
89% |
Performance and Career Development12
(Headcount, year-end) |
2020 |
2021 |
20221 | 2023 |
Employees by gender who received a regular performance review during the reporting period. |
||||
% of male |
99.2% |
98.7% |
100% |
100% |
% of female |
99.0% |
98.2% |
100% |
100% |
% of genderqueer |
0% |
0% |
100% |
100% |
Employees by employee category13 who received a regular performance review during the reporting period. |
||||
% of Executive |
95.7% |
92.8% |
100% |
100% |
% of Managers |
99.8% |
99.4% |
100% |
100% |
% of Technical Staff |
99.5% |
99.0% |
100% |
100% |
% of Staff |
99.0% |
98.6% |
100% |
100% |
Minimum Wage14
Annual Salary (USD) |
2020 |
2021 |
20221 |
2023 |
Lowest U.S. entry-level wage |
n/a |
n/a |
$35,292 |
$38,468 |
Training and Education
(Headcount, year-end) |
2020 |
2021 |
20221 |
2023 |
Total hours of employee training |
n/a |
n/a |
178,944 |
156,561 |
Average hours of training per year per employee |
n/a |
n/a |
7.3 |
6 |
% of the total employees across all locations who received career or skills-related training15 |
n/a |
n/a |
n/a |
26% |
% of the total workforce across all locations who received training (internally or externally) on environmental issues16 |
n/a |
n/a |
n/a |
67% |
AMDer Survey
(Headcount, year-end) |
2020 |
2021 |
20221 |
2023 |
% of employees that responded |
96% |
96% |
96% |
95% |
I am proud to work for AMD (% favorable) |
95% |
94% |
92% |
91% |
I would recommend AMD as a great place to work (% favorable) |
89% |
86% |
86% |
83% |
AMD creates an environment where people of diverse backgrounds can succeed (% favorable) |
93% |
92% |
92% |
92% |
Engagement Index (% favorable) |
88% |
86% |
86% |
86% |
Belonging and Inclusion Index (% favorable) |
89% |
90% |
90% |
89% |
Manager Quality Index (% favorable) |
88% |
88% |
89% |
88% |
Well-Being17
2020 |
2021 |
20221 |
2023 |
|
Number of Global Recordable Injury Cases |
5 |
4 |
3 |
14 |
Rate of Global Recordable Injury Cases (per 200,000 work hours) |
0.04 |
0.02 |
0.01 |
0.04 |
Number of Global Recordable Illness Cases |
1 |
4 |
9 |
0 |
Rate of Global Recordable Illness Cases (per 200,000 work hours) |
0.01 |
0.02 |
0.03 |
0 |
Number of Global Recordable Combined Injury and Illness Cases |
6 |
8 |
12 |
14 |
Rate of Global Recordable Combined Injury and Illness Cases (per 200,000 work hours) |
0.04 |
0.04 |
0.04 |
0.04 |
Number of U.S. Recordable Employee Injury Cases |
4 |
4 |
1 |
8 |
Number of U.S. Recordable Contractor Injury Cases |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
Rate of U.S. Combined Employee and Contractor Recordable Injury Cases (per 200,000 work hours) |
0.08 |
0.06 |
0.02 |
0.08 |
Number of U.S. Recordable Employee Illness Cases |
1 |
2 |
9 |
0 |
Number of U.S. Recordable Contractor Illness Cases |
0 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
Rate of U.S. Combined Employee and Contractor Recordable Illness Cases (per 200,000 work hours) |
0.02 |
0.06 |
0.10 |
0 |
Rate of U.S. Recordable Combined Injury and Illness Cases (per 200,000 work hours) |
0.10 |
0.13 |
0.12 |
0.08 |
Number of Global Employee Work-Related Fatalities |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Number of Global Contractor Work-Related Fatalities |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Number of Global Combined Employee and Contractor Work-Related Fatalities |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Rate of Global Combined Employee and Contractor Work-related Fatalities (per 200,000 work hours) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Number of Global Employee High-Consequence Work-Related Injuries |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Number of Global Contractor High-Consequence Work-Related Injuries |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Number of Global Combined Employee and Contractor High-Consequence Work-Related Injuries |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Rate of Global Combined Employee and Contractor High-Consequence Work-Related Injuries (per 200,000 work hours) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Number of Global Employee High-Consequence Work-Related Illnesses |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Number of Global Contractor High-Consequence Work-Related Illnesses |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Number of Global Combined Employee and Contractor High-Consequence Work-Related Illnesses |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Rate of Global Combined Employee and Contractor High-Consequence Work-Related Illnesses (per 200,000 work hours) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Number of Global Hours Worked |
28,343,784 |
38,583,384 |
59,955,000 |
74,238,696 |
Number of U.S. Hours Worked |
9,699,984 |
12,386,640 |
17,731,896 |
21,387,912 |
Number of U.S. Employee Lost Workdays Cases |
1 |
5 |
7 |
0 |
Number of U.S. Contractor Lost Workdays Cases |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
Number of U.S. Combined Employee and Contractor Lost Workdays Cases |
1 |
6 |
7 |
0 |
Rate of U.S. Combined Employee and Contractor Lost Workdays Cases (per 200,000 work hours) |
0.02 |
0.10 |
0.08 |
0 |
Number of U.S. Lost Time Events for Employees |
1 |
5 |
7 |
0 |
Number of U.S. Lost Time Events for Contractors |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
Rate of U.S. Lost Time Injury (LTI) Frequency for Combined Employee and Contractors |
n/a |
n/a |
n/a |
0 |
Number of U.S. Lost Days due to Employee Injuries |
n/a |
n/a |
n/a |
0 |
Number of U.S. Lost Days due to Contractor Injuries |
n/a |
n/a |
n/a |
0 |
Rate of U.S. Lost Time Injury (LTI) Severity for Combined Employees and Contractors |
n/a |
n/a |
n/a |
0 |
Number of Health or Safety Non-Compliances |
0 |
118 |
119 |
320 |
% of the total workforce across all locations represented in joint management-worker health & safety committees |
n/a |
n/a |
n/a |
28% |
% of AMD Managed Sites for which an EHS risk assessment has been conducted |
n/a |
n/a |
n/a |
30% |
Volunteerism21
2020 |
2021 |
20221 |
2023 |
|
AMD Volunteers |
3,110 |
2,807 |
4,977 |
5,720 |
AMD Volunteer Hours |
7,057 |
9,052 |
17,244 |
25,368 |
Number of Volunteer Events |
71 |
64 |
162 |
288 |
Number of Employee Donors |
n/a |
n/a |
1,888 |
4,167 |
Environmental Performance Indicators
AMD collects environmental data about AMD locations worldwide and direct manufacturing suppliers representing ~95% of total spend, while making spend-based assumptions using CEDA factors for the remaining manufacturing and non-manufacturing suppliers. The following table provides data on energy use, electricity consumption, greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, water use, waste generation and compliance.
We received external limited level assurance in accordance with the International Standard on Assurance Engagements (ISAE) 3000 Revised for 2023 data on our Scope 1 and 2 GHG emissions and related performance against our CR goals, as well as Scope 3 GHG emissions for business travel.
Xilinx and Pensando data from the 2022 acquisitions are incorporated into the 2022 and 2023 metrics below. For 2020 and 2021 data, energy and Scope 1 and 2 GHG data from Xilinx and Pensando are included in support of recalculating base year 2020 and 2021 energy use and related operational GHG emissions.22
|
2020 |
2021 |
20221 |
2023 |
Energy |
|
|
|
|
Total Absolute Energy Use (GWh) |
199 |
182 |
208 |
233 |
Atlanta |
24 |
523 |
n/a |
n/a |
Austin |
25 |
25 |
29 |
32 |
Bengaluru |
4 |
5 |
6 |
9 |
Cyberjaya |
<124 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
Dublin |
8 |
7 |
7 |
8 |
Hyderabad 1 |
6 |
7 |
9 |
12 |
Hyderabad 2 (former Xilinx site) |
7 |
7 |
9 |
10 |
Longmont |
14 |
14 |
19 |
21 |
Markham |
25 |
27 |
28 |
30 |
Milpitas |
3 |
3 |
4 |
n/a |
San Jose |
26 |
27 |
33 |
35 |
Santa Clara |
7 |
8 |
11 |
14 |
Shanghai |
10 |
11 |
12 |
14 |
Singapore 1 |
17 |
16 |
18 |
21 |
Singapore 2 (former Xilinx site) |
13 |
13 |
13 |
13 |
Other sites combined |
5 |
6 |
10 |
13 |
Electricity (Indirect Energy, GWh) |
175 |
161 |
181 |
203 |
Atlanta |
24 |
523 |
n/a |
n/a |
Austin |
25 |
25 |
29 |
32 |
Bengaluru |
4 |
4 |
5 |
8 |
Cyberjaya |
<1 22 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
Dublin |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
Hyderabad 1 |
6 |
7 |
9 |
12 |
Hyderabad 2 (former Xilinx site) |
7 |
7 |
9 |
10 |
Longmont |
12 |
13 |
17 |
19 |
Markham |
21 |
23 |
24 |
26 |
Milpitas |
3 |
3 |
3 |
n/a |
San Jose |
14 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
Santa Clara |
5 |
6 |
7 |
10 |
Shanghai |
10 |
11 |
12 |
14 |
Singapore 1 |
17 |
16 |
18 |
21 |
Singapore 2 (former Xilinx Site) |
13 |
13 |
13 |
13 |
Other sites combined |
9 |
6 |
10 |
14 |
Total Renewable Electricity Use (GWh)25 |
36 |
45 |
66 |
94 |
% of Global Energy Use from Renewable Sources |
18% |
25% |
32% |
40% |
Atlanta |
24 |
0 23 |
n/a |
n/a |
Austin |
0 |
5 |
4 |
19 |
Bengaluru |
0 |
4 |
5 |
8 |
Dublin |
n/a |
n/a |
5 |
5 |
Hyderabad 1 |
0 |
7 |
9 |
12 |
Hyderabad 2 (former Xilinx site) |
0 |
0 |
9 |
10 |
San Jose |
2 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
Shanghai |
10 |
11 |
12 |
14 |
Other |
<1 |
1 |
4 |
7 |
Total Non-Renewable Electricity Use (GWh) |
139 |
116 |
115 |
109 |
Total Energy/Revenue (MWh/$USD Millions)26 |
20.4 |
11.1 |
8.8 |
10.3 |
Energy Use (Direct, GWh) |
24 |
21 |
27 |
30 |
Atlanta |
<1 |
<1 23 |
n/a |
n/a |
Austin |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
Cyberjaya |
<1 22 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
Dublin |
3 |
3 |
2 |
3 |
Longmont |
2 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
Markham |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
San Jose27 |
11 |
10 |
15 |
16 |
Santa Clara |
2 |
2 |
4 |
4 |
Singapore 1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
Singapore 2 (former Xilinx Site) |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
Other sites combined |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
Greenhouse Gas Emissions |
2020 |
2021 |
2022 |
2023 |
Total Scope 1 Emissions28 (mtco2e) |
6,412 |
6,487 |
8,145 |
10,008 |
Atlanta |
43 |
723 |
<1 |
<1 |
Austin |
93 |
60 |
114 |
1,724 |
Bengaluru |
35 |
111 |
547 |
898 |
Boston |
n/a |
n/a |
n/a |
100 |
Cyberjaya |
n/a 22 |
n/a |
n/a |
n/a |
Dublin |
708 |
612 |
418 |
664 |
Hyderabad 1 |
18 |
22 |
1,065 |
960 |
Hyderabad 2 (former Xilinx site) |
12 |
7 |
32 |
28 |
Longmont |
343 |
279 |
579 |
560 |
Markham |
883 |
926 |
857 |
963 |
Milpitas |
106 |
106 |
106 |
n/a |
San Jose |
3,032 |
2,662 |
3,396 |
3,333 |
Santa Clara |
321 |
288 |
378 |
400 |
Singapore 1 |
814 |
781 |
124 |
261 |
Singapore 2 (former Xilinx Site) |
5 |
5 |
216 |
116 |
All other sites combined |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
Total Scope 2 Market-based Emissions29 (mtco2e) |
55,342 |
49,391 |
39,745 |
36,597 |
Atlanta |
0 |
2,13323 |
n/a |
n/a |
Austin |
11,368 |
8,360 |
10,076 |
5,298 |
Bengaluru |
2,451 |
0 |
25 |
0 |
Cyberjaya |
158 22 |
108 |
106 |
105 |
Dublin |
1,299 |
1,142 |
2,306 |
0 |
Hyderabad 1 |
4,190 |
0 |
0 |
88 |
Hyderabad 2 (former Xilinx site) |
4,547 |
5,096 |
0 |
0 |
Longmont |
6,800 |
7,441 |
9,080 |
10,119 |
Markham |
2,582 |
2,820 |
3,001 |
730 |
Milpitas |
563 |
578 |
733 |
n/a |
San Jose |
5,109 |
5,147 |
0 |
0 |
Santa Clara |
1,215 |
1,247 |
1,799 |
2,528 |
Shanghai |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Singapore 1 |
6,443 |
6,300 |
6,838 |
8,265 |
Singapore 2 (former Xilinx site) |
4,805 |
4,980 |
3,503 |
2,367 |
All other sites combined |
3,812 |
4,039 |
2,278 |
7,097 |
Total Scope 1 and 2 Market-based Emissions (mtco2e) |
61,754 |
55,878 |
47890 |
46,606 |
Scope 1 and 2 Market-based Emission Reductions30 (% reduction from 2020) |
n/a |
9.5% |
22.5% |
24.5% |
Scope 1 and 2 Market-based Emissions/Revenue (Scope 1 and 2 mtco2e/$USD millions) 26 |
6.3 |
3.4 |
2.0 |
2.0 |
Total Scope 2 Location-based Emissions 29, 31 (mtco2e) |
68,494 |
70,659 |
74,479 |
80,839 |
Atlanta |
11,183 |
2,11823 |
n/a |
n/a |
Austin |
10,753 |
9,820 |
9,060 |
11,975 |
Bengaluru |
2,646 |
3,084 |
3,667 |
5,541 |
Cyberjaya |
n/a 22 |
n/a |
n/a |
105 |
Hyderabad 1 |
4,525 |
4,837 |
6,124 |
8,752 |
Hyderabad 2 (former Xilinx site) |
n/a |
n/a |
6,137 |
7,202 |
Longmont |
5,669 |
6,989 |
9,012 |
9,897 |
Markham |
2,743 |
2,586 |
2,923 |
730 |
San Jose |
n/a |
n/a |
3,776 |
3,874 |
Santa Clara |
1,211 |
1,224 |
1,800 |
2,499 |
Shanghai |
5,929 |
6,885 |
7,605 |
8,426 |
Singapore 1 |
6,483 |
6,182 |
6,848 |
8,265 |
Singapore 2 (former Xilinx site) |
n/a |
n/a |
4,960 |
4,408 |
All other sites combined |
17,352 |
26,934 |
12,567 |
9,165 |
Total Scope 1 and 2 Location-based Emissions (mtco2e) |
74,907 |
77,148 |
82,624 |
90,848 |
Scope 1 and 2 Location-based Emissions/Revenue (Scope 1 and 2 mtCO2e/$USD million) 26 |
7.7 |
4.7 |
3.5 |
4.0 |
Estimated Scope 3 Emissions (mtco2e)32 |
6,554,528 | 12,812,872 |
26,339,663 |
21,772,203 |
Category 1: Purchased goods and services |
2,278,354 |
3,744,604 |
3,957,748 |
3,858,477 |
Category 3: Fuel-and energy-related activities (not in Scope 1+2) |
12,565 |
14,490 |
19,750 |
17,004 |
Category 4: Upstream transportation and distribution |
39,488 |
61,175 |
80,947 |
90,702 |
Category 5: Waste generated in operations |
48 |
41 |
79 |
260 |
Category 6: Business travel |
2,429 |
671 |
10,779 |
13,985 |
Category 7: Employee commuting |
2,788 |
7,370 |
33,247 |
35,052 |
Category 11: Use of sold products |
4,217,421 |
8,983,025 |
22,236,48433 | 17,755,897 |
Category 12: End of Life treatment of sold products |
1,475 |
1,496 |
63033 |
825 |
Total Estimated Scope 3 Emissions Per Revenue (mtco2e / USD $ Millions) 26 |
671 |
780 |
1,116 |
959 |
| Non-GHG Emissions | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 |
| NOx Emissions (metric tons) | n/a | n/a | n/a | 26 |
| SOx Emissions (metric tons) | n/a | n/a | n/a | 0.6 |
Water |
2020 |
2021 |
2022 |
2023 |
Total Water Use (million liters) |
151 |
7524 |
183 |
225 |
Atlanta |
28 |
523 |
n/a |
n/a |
Austin |
4 |
5 |
5 |
14 |
Bengaluru |
4 |
2 |
3 |
5 |
Cyberjaya |
n/a 22 |
n/a |
n/a |
n/a |
Dublin |
n/a |
n/a |
9 |
13 |
Hyderabad |
4 |
3 |
8 |
9 |
Hyderabad 2 (former Xilinx site) |
n/a |
n/a |
4 |
11 |
Longmont |
n/a |
n/a |
72 |
46 |
Markham |
81 |
24 |
19 |
40 |
San Jose |
n/a |
n/a |
20 |
26 |
Santa Clara |
13 |
12 |
12 |
18 |
Shanghai |
12 |
15 |
14 |
18 |
Singapore |
5 |
8 |
10 |
9 |
Singapore 2 (former Xilinx site) |
n/a |
n/a |
6 |
8 |
Other sites combined |
<1 |
<1 |
1 |
9 |
Water Use/Revenue (ML/$USD millions)26 |
0.015 |
0.005 |
0.008 |
0.010 |
Contract Wafer Manufacturing Water Use (ML)35 |
8,483 |
11,069 |
12,657 |
12,505 |
Contract Wafer Manufacturing Water use / Revenue (ML/USD millions) 26 |
0.87 |
0.52 |
0.36 |
0.37 |
Waste |
2020 |
2021 |
2022 |
2023 |
Total Non-Hazardous Waste (NHW) Generated (metric tons) |
522 |
452 |
785 |
1268 |
Atlanta |
35 |
n/a23 |
n/a |
2036 |
Austin |
163 |
163 |
182 |
190 |
Bengaluru |
1 |
2 |
21 |
21 |
Dublin |
n/a |
n/a |
29 |
45 |
Hyderabad |
4 |
5 |
15 |
46 |
Longmont |
n/a |
n/a |
55 |
57 |
Markham |
228 |
226 |
211 |
468 |
San Jose |
n/a |
n/a |
180 |
285 |
Santa Clara |
35 |
28 |
37 |
34 |
Singapore 1 |
55 |
23 |
31 |
38 |
Singapore 2 (former Xilinx site) |
n/a |
n/a |
15 |
25 |
Other sites combined |
2 |
5 |
2 |
39 |
NHW Recycled (metric tons) |
402 |
383 |
622 |
755 |
NHW Landfilled (metric tons) |
86 |
69 |
135 |
461 |
NHW Incinerated (metric tons) |
n/a | n/a | 28 | 29 |
NHW Treated (metric tons) |
n/a | n/a | n/a | 22 |
| NHW Landfill Diversion Rate (%) | 82% |
85% | 83% | 63% |
Total Hazardous Waste (HW) Generated (metric tons) |
3 |
4 |
24 |
80 |
Austin |
2 |
2 |
2 |
5 |
Bengaluru |
n/a |
n/a |
n/a |
1 |
Hyderabad |
n/a |
n/a |
n/a |
20 |
Hyderabad 2 (former Xilinx site) |
n/a |
n/a |
12 |
2 |
Markham |
1 |
1 |
<1 |
1 |
Santa Clara |
<1 |
<1 |
2 |
<1 |
Singapore 1 |
<1 |
<1 |
8 |
50 |
Singapore 2 (former Xilinx site) |
n/a |
n/a |
<1 |
1 |
Other sites combined |
n/a |
n/a |
<1 |
<1 |
HW Recycled/Reused (metric tons) |
1 |
<1 |
12 |
24 |
HW Treated Off-Site (metric tons) |
<1 |
1 |
8 |
50 |
HW Incinerated (metric tons) |
<1 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
HW Landfilled (metric tons) |
1 |
2 |
2 |
3 |
Total Waste Generated (NHW+HW) (metric tons) |
491 |
455 |
809 |
1348 |
Total Waste Generated per Revenue (metric tons/$USD millions) |
0.05 |
0.03 |
0.03 |
0.06 |
Contract Wafer Manufacturing HW Generated (metric tons)35 |
28,981 |
44,362 |
47,018 |
44,292 |
Contract Wafer Manufacturing HW Generated per Revenue (metric tons/$USD millions) 26 |
2.97 |
2.70 |
1.99 |
1.95 |
Wastewater |
2020 |
2021 |
2022 |
2023 |
Total Wastewater Discharge37 (million liters) |
4 |
3 |
16 |
18 |
Austin |
4 |
3 |
3 |
7 |
Longmont |
n/a |
n/a |
12 |
11 |
Wastewater generated per Revenue (ML/$USD Millions)26 |
0.0004 |
0.0002 |
0.0007 |
0.0008 |
Compliance |
2020 |
2021 |
2022 |
2023 |
Number of Environmental Non-Compliances |
0 |
0 |
0 |
138 |
Fines (USD) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
$8,072 |
Economic Performance Indicators
The following tables provide information about our company’s annual financial data, social investments and U.S. political activities.
Financial Data39
2020 |
2021 |
2022 |
2023 |
|
Total Revenue (millions USD) |
$9,763 |
$16,434 |
$23,601 |
$22,680 |
Research and Development (millions USD) |
$1,983 |
$2,845 |
$5,005 |
$5,872 |
Net Income (loss) (millions USD) |
$2,490 |
$3,162 |
$1,320 |
$854 |
Social Investments
2020 |
2021 |
2022 |
2023 |
|
By Type |
|
|||
AMD Foundation - Charitable Grants (USD) |
$91,814 |
$32,500 |
$101,388 |
$10,000 |
Cash and In-Kind Giving (USD) |
$8,274,09040 |
$1,814,847 |
$5,042,084 |
$5,020,122 |
Matching Gift and Volunteer Reward (USD) |
n/a |
n/a |
$961,178 |
$1,689,672 |
Total (USD) |
$8,365,904 |
$1,847,347 |
$6,104,650 |
$6,719,794 |
By Region41 |
|
|||
Total Americas (USD) |
$7,819,239 |
$1,205,217 |
$3,715,629 |
$2,908,785 |
Total Europe/Africa (USD) |
$104,105 |
$156,935 |
$990,436 |
$906,152 |
Total Asia-Pacific/China/India (USD) |
$442,560 |
$485,195 |
$437,408 |
$1,215,185 |
By Focus Area39 |
|
|||
Total Education (USD) |
$194,026 |
$294,172 |
$678,860 |
$923,910 |
Total Disaster relief and humanitarian aid (USD) |
$969,700 |
$125,000 |
$135,500 |
$0 |
Total Social Services (USD) |
$833,631 |
$445,077 |
$224,126 |
$376,544 |
Total Scientific Research (USD) |
$6,348,018 |
$955,653 |
$4,040,005 |
$3,643,973 |
Total Environment (USD) |
$20,529 |
$27,445 |
$64,982 |
$85,695 |
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. Political Action Committee (PAC)42
2020 |
2021 |
2022 |
2023 |
|
Total Contributions (USD) |
$30,600 |
$11,250 |
$36,500 |
$33,000 |
Total Receipts (USD) |
$31,300 |
$31,000 |
$62,465 |
$6,000 |
Footnotes
- Reported data for 2022 onward reflects all AMD operations, and it includes data resulting from the acquisitions of Xilinx and Pensando Systems (unless otherwise stated).
- Reported data includes AMD employees, temporary workers and contractors.
- Reported employee data by gender prior to 2021 excludes a small number of employees that chose not to disclose gender.
- Genderqueer was added as a new category for employees to self-identify gender beginning in 2022.
- AMD Executive Leadership Team (c-suite).
- Includes People Managers that are in the Director or Fellow level positions and above. Reported employee data exclude unknown gender.
- Number of total terminations divided by the average monthly regular headcount throughout the year.
- Voluntary terminations are defined as the number of regular employees leaving AMD voluntarily, excluding retirements.
- Other turnover rate (%) is defined as the number of other terminations divided by the average monthly regular headcount throughout the year. Other termination reasons include involuntary, RIF, death, and retirement.
- Based on employees who were on LOA Parental / Maternity with a start date in that year and if returned to work after the LOA end date (with Voluntary or Family reasons). Reported data is for AMD employees.
- AMD offers paid parental leave globally to its FTE employees. “Parental leave” can encompass various types of leaves in different countries; it provides time off for parents to nurture their families and make necessary life adjustments.
- Includes AMD employees hired on or before September 30th of the reporting year.
- Employee categories are defined as Executive: Director level positions and above; Manager: Manager and Senior Manager Job Titles; Technical Staff: Member of Technical Staff through Corporate Fellow; Professional: Supervisor positions; and Staff: Employees from Junior level positions to Professional.
- AMD employee base pay is benchmarked to the competitive high-tech market of companies our size, with our midpoint targets at or above the median of the market.
- Reported value is based on the total number of employees across all locations who received career- or skills-related instructor led training - excluding compliance, functional specific, or eLearning trainings.
- Reported value is calculated based on the number of employees that complete the AMD Global HSSE Workplace Orientation training during the reporting period.
- The reported data includes AMD employees and contract workers who report directly to an AMD employee. Our reporting guidelines are based on OSHA reporting criteria. Minor (first aid level) injuries are not included. Lost days are calculated based on scheduled workdays. The scope of our wellbeing (health and Safety) reporting was expanded in 2023 to include additional metrics and categories. Consequently, some data for prior years is not available for comparison.
- On April 28, 2021, a Notice of Violation was received from the Austin Fire Department for a small site in Austin. Two deficiencies were noted, one for the failure of a heat detector and the other for inability to inspect two other detectors. All corrective actions were completed, and the site was back in compliance on May 4, 2021.
- A missing placard was identified during a San Jose Fire Department hazardous materials inspection at the San Jose site. A placard was posted, and the agency confirmed the violation was resolved.
- California Department of Public Health issued an NOV on July 6, 2023, for missing signage on X-ray equipment at the San Jose site. Signs were added and NOV was closed on Aug 8, 2023. The San Jose Fire Department issued two NOVs in November 2023 for delayed submittal of fire alarm inspections. The information was submitted, and the NOV was closed on December 1, 2023.
- Reported data includes AMD employees and contractors.
- 2020 and 2021 data includes energy use and Scope 1 and 2 GHG emission data from Xilinx and Pensando in order to reset the 2020 GHG goal baseline per the GHG Protocol, but does not include other data (i.e., water, waste) from the acquisitions in those years. All 2022 and 2023 environmental metrics include Xilinx and Pensando data.
- AMD migrated US data center operations near Atlanta to a third-party operated, collocated facility (powered by 100% renewable energy)
- AMD decommissioned a data center in Cyberjaya, Malaysia in 2020 but continues to have an office location.
- AMD sources renewable energy through utility providers (U.S., Ireland) and third-party certified renewable energy credits (Green-e certified RECs in the US and certified iRECs in China, India and Singapore), as well as generates renewable energy onsite in the U.S.
- For financial intensity metrics, AMD reports the environmental metric and divides by the corresponding year annual revenue (in millions of USD). Energy use is MWh of energy per $1M USD revenue, and the 2020 and 2021 revenue reflects AMD prior to the acquisitions although energy use is included from the acquisitions due to the 2020 base year reset for our GHG reduction goal. Emissions financial intensity is metric tCO2e per $1M USD in revenue, shown both for location-based and market-based scope 2 emissions. Water use and wastewater discharge are reported as millions of liters of water used or discharged per $1M USD in revenue.
- San Jose has fuel cells that convert diesel into electricity. The emissions related to the fuel cells are reported under Scope 1. The site also generates renewable energy onsite, which is included in the site electricity use but assigned a zero emission factor.
- AMD follows the GHG Protocol for Scope 1 emission estimates, the internationally recognized standard for the corporate accounting and reporting of GHG emissions. Scope 1 emissions factors estimated based on quantity of refrigerants and fuel consumed in each geography, including natural gas and refrigerants such as hexafluoroethane (HFE) and hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs). The scope is based on operational control (i.e., AMD occupied facilities) and the method includes Site Metrics Coordinators entering the monthly amount of fuel and chemicals use, by type, into AMD’s central database, and then applying the emission factors. Emission factors were obtained from three main sources: DESNZ 2023 (previously referred to as DEFRA or UK BEIS in previous documents), IPCC AR5 (5th Assessment Report) or US EPA Fluorinated GHG Report.) Values have undergone third-party limited assurance.
- AMD follows the GHG Protocol for Scope 2 emission estimates by multiplying the quantity of electricity consumed at each site by relevant emission factors. If electricity use data is not available, as for small offices, then an average value for U.S. office buildings is used for all AMD locations (16.9 kWh/sq ft) based on EIA CBECS results for the average administrative office, and the emission factor for the location is applied. AMD applies both the market-based and location-based methods for estimating scope 2 emissions. Market-based emission calculations are based on grid electricity use minus renewable energy sourced through green tariffs and minus renewable energy credits (RECs) allocated to each site. Location-based emission calculations are based on the quantity of grid electricity used plus renewable energy sourced through utility “green tariff” programs or RECs. Emission factors for locations in the U.S. are based on eGRID and Green-e 2021 databases. Location-based electricity emission factors for Canada are provided in the 2023 Canada NIR report, specific to each Canadian province. Market-based emission factors for Europe were taken from the 2021 AIB European Residual Mix report and IEA 2021 emission factor database. Location-based emission factors for all countries other than the US and Canada were taken from the IEA 2023 emission factor database.
- Our goal is a 50 percent reduction in absolute Scope 1 and 2 GHG emissions from 2020-2030.
- Some site location-based GHG emission values for Xilinx and Pensando sites in 2020-21, prior to acquisition by AMD, are estimates under 'other site' approximations.
- In 2020 and 2021, AMD expanded the estimations for scope 3 reporting, thereby notably increasing total values reported those years. Our value chain emissions are estimated following the guidance from the GHG protocol. Category 1: Emissions are calculated by directly surveying suppliers representing ~95% of our total supply chain spend (includes Foundry, final test/assembly, substrates). It includes their estimated allocations to AMD (typically using revenue-based accounting), at a factory level where available, for their Scope 1 and 2 emissions, as well as upstream Scope 3 if available. For Foundries, we used a third-party verified life cycle assessment to estimate upstream emissions. For other suppliers we apply a spend-based method by mapping spend categories to the associated Scope 3 CEDA emission factor. Emissions from all other vendors (including marketing, professional services, real estate, software providers, telecom and networking providers and other manufacturing services) are calculated using a spend-based method. Category 2: Calculated following a spend-based method and are included in the disclosed figure in Category 1. Category 3: Emissions are calculated using fuel and electricity consumption data collected from our sites globally, and Well-to-tank (WTT) emission factors for natural gas and diesel were obtained from the DESNZ 2023 Conversion Factors database. Emission factors for transmission & distribution-related electricity losses, and electricity-related WTT generation and transmission and distribution, were obtained from the IEA Emission Factors 2023 database and the IPCC AR5 report. Category 4: emissions are estimated using a hybrid methodology combining supplier-specific emissions reported by two of our major shipping providers and a mode-specific, spend-based calculation on all other logistics spend. Category 5: Waste data is collected from our sites globally. End-of-life, disposal method-specific emissions factors were obtained from the 2023 DESNZ Conversion Factors database. A recycling emission factor was obtained from the 2021 DESNZ Conversion Factors database. Category 6: Emissions include commercial and private jet air travel provided by our travel agencies, in accordance with the GHG Protocol, whereby flights were categorized as either short-, medium-, or long-haul and the appropriate DESNZ 2022 factors are applied. For car rental and train travel, we used spend-based estimates from the CEDA 5.0 EEIO database. Category 7: Emissions are based on survey data and/or local commuter data from our ~10 largest campuses and are calculated using a distance-based method for average distance traveled and mode. Emissions are adjusted to reflect the proportion of employees returning to the office since 2021. Category 11: Emissions are calculated based on total sales volume, average product electricity consumption, and average product lifetime split by product category for all products sold in the reporting year. Emissions were calculated by multiplying total energy consumption by the corresponding country-level emission factor from IEA 2023. A percentage of data center-related products are assumed to be powered with renewable electricity based on public reporting from our customers. In 2023, AMD added estimates for Xilinx products, including for the first year of the acquisition (2022). Category 12: Emissions are calculated based on the average product weight by product category and the total sales volume within the reporting year. A weight-based calculation is used, with the disposal method estimated using region-specific e-waste disposal benchmarks obtained from the Global e-Waste Statistics Partnership (2024). Region-specific waste disposal benchmarks obtained from the World Bank. Disposal type-specific emission factors obtained from the EPA GHG Emission Factor Hub (2023). Region-specific blended average waste disposal emission factors were calculated using waste disposal benchmarks.
- In 2023, AMD restated estimated 2022 product use and end of use estimates (Scope 3 categories 11 and 12) to include Xilinx and Pensando data following 2022 acquisitions.
- The 50% reduction in water use from 2020 to 2021 was attributed to several factors including moving an AMD data center operation to a co-located facility; water conservation efforts at AMD Markham from replacing several cooling units; and having fewer employees on-site due to COVID-19 protocols.
- AMD receives estimated data on from our primary wafer foundries on energy use, GHG emissions, water use, hazardous and non-hazardous waste attributed to the manufacturing of AMD products.
- AMD moved its data center operations from Atlanta in 2021 to a collocated facility but decommissioned server and other equipment in 2023.
- AMD generates a limited amount of wastewater that requires treatment by the municipal wastewater treatment plant, in accordance with water quality permitting.
- On 12/14/2023, the City of Markham performed an unannounced McNabb construction site visit and notified AMD of a failure to meet the “Tree Preservation By-Law.” An approved permit and protection barriers were needed prior to beginning outdoor work laying conduit and the construction contractors failed to comply. The City required an arborist to inspect the trees and provide a tree impact report. The arborist, hired by the construction company (DPI), came to the site on 12/16/2203 and provided a report to the City which stated that three trees (each 14 inch+ in diameter) were severely damaged and will need to be removed. The City required AMD to remove the three trees by Jan 31, 2024, and gave an option of planting 18 trees or pay a fine of $10,800 ($600 for each tree not planted) by May 31, 2024. An arborist (hired by DPI) removed the trees on January 24, 2024. After discussion with the property owner, AMD opted to replace three trees and pay cash in lieu for fifteen. Action of tree removal was confirmed by the City on January 26, 2024, and cash in lieu on April 17, 2024. The City confirmed compliance via email on May 9, 2024
- Economic data for current and past years are updated annually to reflect the company’s most recent financial reports.
- 2020 increase based in large part on contributions from the AMD COVID-19 High-Performance Compute (HPC) Fund. The program details are available at https://www.amd.com/en/corporate/hpc-fund.html.
- Reported data by region and focus area excludes Matching Gift and Volunteer Rewards.
- The AMD PAC is 100 percent funded by personal contributions from eligible donors, which include certain employees and their spouses, and is used to support candidates running for public office. AMD cannot, and does not, make any direct or indirect financial contributions to federal political candidates or committees. Totals of U.S. contributions and receipts associated with the AMD PAC are available on the U.S. Federal Election Commission website. Additional information on AMD Public Policy Engagement and U.S. Political Activities can be found here: https://www.amd.com/en/corporate/corporate-responsibility/governance/public-policy-engagement.html.
- Reported data for 2022 onward reflects all AMD operations, and it includes data resulting from the acquisitions of Xilinx and Pensando Systems (unless otherwise stated).
- Reported data includes AMD employees, temporary workers and contractors.
- Reported employee data by gender prior to 2021 excludes a small number of employees that chose not to disclose gender.
- Genderqueer was added as a new category for employees to self-identify gender beginning in 2022.
- AMD Executive Leadership Team (c-suite).
- Includes People Managers that are in the Director or Fellow level positions and above. Reported employee data exclude unknown gender.
- Number of total terminations divided by the average monthly regular headcount throughout the year.
- Voluntary terminations are defined as the number of regular employees leaving AMD voluntarily, excluding retirements.
- Other turnover rate (%) is defined as the number of other terminations divided by the average monthly regular headcount throughout the year. Other termination reasons include involuntary, RIF, death, and retirement.
- Based on employees who were on LOA Parental / Maternity with a start date in that year and if returned to work after the LOA end date (with Voluntary or Family reasons). Reported data is for AMD employees.
- AMD offers paid parental leave globally to its FTE employees. “Parental leave” can encompass various types of leaves in different countries; it provides time off for parents to nurture their families and make necessary life adjustments.
- Includes AMD employees hired on or before September 30th of the reporting year.
- Employee categories are defined as Executive: Director level positions and above; Manager: Manager and Senior Manager Job Titles; Technical Staff: Member of Technical Staff through Corporate Fellow; Professional: Supervisor positions; and Staff: Employees from Junior level positions to Professional.
- AMD employee base pay is benchmarked to the competitive high-tech market of companies our size, with our midpoint targets at or above the median of the market.
- Reported value is based on the total number of employees across all locations who received career- or skills-related instructor led training - excluding compliance, functional specific, or eLearning trainings.
- Reported value is calculated based on the number of employees that complete the AMD Global HSSE Workplace Orientation training during the reporting period.
- The reported data includes AMD employees and contract workers who report directly to an AMD employee. Our reporting guidelines are based on OSHA reporting criteria. Minor (first aid level) injuries are not included. Lost days are calculated based on scheduled workdays. The scope of our wellbeing (health and Safety) reporting was expanded in 2023 to include additional metrics and categories. Consequently, some data for prior years is not available for comparison.
- On April 28, 2021, a Notice of Violation was received from the Austin Fire Department for a small site in Austin. Two deficiencies were noted, one for the failure of a heat detector and the other for inability to inspect two other detectors. All corrective actions were completed, and the site was back in compliance on May 4, 2021.
- A missing placard was identified during a San Jose Fire Department hazardous materials inspection at the San Jose site. A placard was posted, and the agency confirmed the violation was resolved.
- California Department of Public Health issued an NOV on July 6, 2023, for missing signage on X-ray equipment at the San Jose site. Signs were added and NOV was closed on Aug 8, 2023. The San Jose Fire Department issued two NOVs in November 2023 for delayed submittal of fire alarm inspections. The information was submitted, and the NOV was closed on December 1, 2023.
- Reported data includes AMD employees and contractors.
- 2020 and 2021 data includes energy use and Scope 1 and 2 GHG emission data from Xilinx and Pensando in order to reset the 2020 GHG goal baseline per the GHG Protocol, but does not include other data (i.e., water, waste) from the acquisitions in those years. All 2022 and 2023 environmental metrics include Xilinx and Pensando data.
- AMD migrated US data center operations near Atlanta to a third-party operated, collocated facility (powered by 100% renewable energy)
- AMD decommissioned a data center in Cyberjaya, Malaysia in 2020 but continues to have an office location.
- AMD sources renewable energy through utility providers (U.S., Ireland) and third-party certified renewable energy credits (Green-e certified RECs in the US and certified iRECs in China, India and Singapore), as well as generates renewable energy onsite in the U.S.
- For financial intensity metrics, AMD reports the environmental metric and divides by the corresponding year annual revenue (in millions of USD). Energy use is MWh of energy per $1M USD revenue, and the 2020 and 2021 revenue reflects AMD prior to the acquisitions although energy use is included from the acquisitions due to the 2020 base year reset for our GHG reduction goal. Emissions financial intensity is metric tCO2e per $1M USD in revenue, shown both for location-based and market-based scope 2 emissions. Water use and wastewater discharge are reported as millions of liters of water used or discharged per $1M USD in revenue.
- San Jose has fuel cells that convert diesel into electricity. The emissions related to the fuel cells are reported under Scope 1. The site also generates renewable energy onsite, which is included in the site electricity use but assigned a zero emission factor.
- AMD follows the GHG Protocol for Scope 1 emission estimates, the internationally recognized standard for the corporate accounting and reporting of GHG emissions. Scope 1 emissions factors estimated based on quantity of refrigerants and fuel consumed in each geography, including natural gas and refrigerants such as hexafluoroethane (HFE) and hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs). The scope is based on operational control (i.e., AMD occupied facilities) and the method includes Site Metrics Coordinators entering the monthly amount of fuel and chemicals use, by type, into AMD’s central database, and then applying the emission factors. Emission factors were obtained from three main sources: DESNZ 2023 (previously referred to as DEFRA or UK BEIS in previous documents), IPCC AR5 (5th Assessment Report) or US EPA Fluorinated GHG Report.) Values have undergone third-party limited assurance.
- AMD follows the GHG Protocol for Scope 2 emission estimates by multiplying the quantity of electricity consumed at each site by relevant emission factors. If electricity use data is not available, as for small offices, then an average value for U.S. office buildings is used for all AMD locations (16.9 kWh/sq ft) based on EIA CBECS results for the average administrative office, and the emission factor for the location is applied. AMD applies both the market-based and location-based methods for estimating scope 2 emissions. Market-based emission calculations are based on grid electricity use minus renewable energy sourced through green tariffs and minus renewable energy credits (RECs) allocated to each site. Location-based emission calculations are based on the quantity of grid electricity used plus renewable energy sourced through utility “green tariff” programs or RECs. Emission factors for locations in the U.S. are based on eGRID and Green-e 2021 databases. Location-based electricity emission factors for Canada are provided in the 2023 Canada NIR report, specific to each Canadian province. Market-based emission factors for Europe were taken from the 2021 AIB European Residual Mix report and IEA 2021 emission factor database. Location-based emission factors for all countries other than the US and Canada were taken from the IEA 2023 emission factor database.
- Our goal is a 50 percent reduction in absolute Scope 1 and 2 GHG emissions from 2020-2030.
- Some site location-based GHG emission values for Xilinx and Pensando sites in 2020-21, prior to acquisition by AMD, are estimates under 'other site' approximations.
- In 2020 and 2021, AMD expanded the estimations for scope 3 reporting, thereby notably increasing total values reported those years. Our value chain emissions are estimated following the guidance from the GHG protocol. Category 1: Emissions are calculated by directly surveying suppliers representing ~95% of our total supply chain spend (includes Foundry, final test/assembly, substrates). It includes their estimated allocations to AMD (typically using revenue-based accounting), at a factory level where available, for their Scope 1 and 2 emissions, as well as upstream Scope 3 if available. For Foundries, we used a third-party verified life cycle assessment to estimate upstream emissions. For other suppliers we apply a spend-based method by mapping spend categories to the associated Scope 3 CEDA emission factor. Emissions from all other vendors (including marketing, professional services, real estate, software providers, telecom and networking providers and other manufacturing services) are calculated using a spend-based method. Category 2: Calculated following a spend-based method and are included in the disclosed figure in Category 1. Category 3: Emissions are calculated using fuel and electricity consumption data collected from our sites globally, and Well-to-tank (WTT) emission factors for natural gas and diesel were obtained from the DESNZ 2023 Conversion Factors database. Emission factors for transmission & distribution-related electricity losses, and electricity-related WTT generation and transmission and distribution, were obtained from the IEA Emission Factors 2023 database and the IPCC AR5 report. Category 4: emissions are estimated using a hybrid methodology combining supplier-specific emissions reported by two of our major shipping providers and a mode-specific, spend-based calculation on all other logistics spend. Category 5: Waste data is collected from our sites globally. End-of-life, disposal method-specific emissions factors were obtained from the 2023 DESNZ Conversion Factors database. A recycling emission factor was obtained from the 2021 DESNZ Conversion Factors database. Category 6: Emissions include commercial and private jet air travel provided by our travel agencies, in accordance with the GHG Protocol, whereby flights were categorized as either short-, medium-, or long-haul and the appropriate DESNZ 2022 factors are applied. For car rental and train travel, we used spend-based estimates from the CEDA 5.0 EEIO database. Category 7: Emissions are based on survey data and/or local commuter data from our ~10 largest campuses and are calculated using a distance-based method for average distance traveled and mode. Emissions are adjusted to reflect the proportion of employees returning to the office since 2021. Category 11: Emissions are calculated based on total sales volume, average product electricity consumption, and average product lifetime split by product category for all products sold in the reporting year. Emissions were calculated by multiplying total energy consumption by the corresponding country-level emission factor from IEA 2023. A percentage of data center-related products are assumed to be powered with renewable electricity based on public reporting from our customers. In 2023, AMD added estimates for Xilinx products, including for the first year of the acquisition (2022). Category 12: Emissions are calculated based on the average product weight by product category and the total sales volume within the reporting year. A weight-based calculation is used, with the disposal method estimated using region-specific e-waste disposal benchmarks obtained from the Global e-Waste Statistics Partnership (2024). Region-specific waste disposal benchmarks obtained from the World Bank. Disposal type-specific emission factors obtained from the EPA GHG Emission Factor Hub (2023). Region-specific blended average waste disposal emission factors were calculated using waste disposal benchmarks.
- In 2023, AMD restated estimated 2022 product use and end of use estimates (Scope 3 categories 11 and 12) to include Xilinx and Pensando data following 2022 acquisitions.
- The 50% reduction in water use from 2020 to 2021 was attributed to several factors including moving an AMD data center operation to a co-located facility; water conservation efforts at AMD Markham from replacing several cooling units; and having fewer employees on-site due to COVID-19 protocols.
- AMD receives estimated data on from our primary wafer foundries on energy use, GHG emissions, water use, hazardous and non-hazardous waste attributed to the manufacturing of AMD products.
- AMD moved its data center operations from Atlanta in 2021 to a collocated facility but decommissioned server and other equipment in 2023.
- AMD generates a limited amount of wastewater that requires treatment by the municipal wastewater treatment plant, in accordance with water quality permitting.
- On 12/14/2023, the City of Markham performed an unannounced McNabb construction site visit and notified AMD of a failure to meet the “Tree Preservation By-Law.” An approved permit and protection barriers were needed prior to beginning outdoor work laying conduit and the construction contractors failed to comply. The City required an arborist to inspect the trees and provide a tree impact report. The arborist, hired by the construction company (DPI), came to the site on 12/16/2203 and provided a report to the City which stated that three trees (each 14 inch+ in diameter) were severely damaged and will need to be removed. The City required AMD to remove the three trees by Jan 31, 2024, and gave an option of planting 18 trees or pay a fine of $10,800 ($600 for each tree not planted) by May 31, 2024. An arborist (hired by DPI) removed the trees on January 24, 2024. After discussion with the property owner, AMD opted to replace three trees and pay cash in lieu for fifteen. Action of tree removal was confirmed by the City on January 26, 2024, and cash in lieu on April 17, 2024. The City confirmed compliance via email on May 9, 2024
- Economic data for current and past years are updated annually to reflect the company’s most recent financial reports.
- 2020 increase based in large part on contributions from the AMD COVID-19 High-Performance Compute (HPC) Fund. The program details are available at https://www.amd.com/en/corporate/hpc-fund.html.
- Reported data by region and focus area excludes Matching Gift and Volunteer Rewards.
- The AMD PAC is 100 percent funded by personal contributions from eligible donors, which include certain employees and their spouses, and is used to support candidates running for public office. AMD cannot, and does not, make any direct or indirect financial contributions to federal political candidates or committees. Totals of U.S. contributions and receipts associated with the AMD PAC are available on the U.S. Federal Election Commission website. Additional information on AMD Public Policy Engagement and U.S. Political Activities can be found here: https://www.amd.com/en/corporate/corporate-responsibility/governance/public-policy-engagement.html.
Social Performance Indicators
The following tables provide annual data on our global workforce including employee diversity, new hires, employee turnover, parental leave, career development, training, well-being and volunteerism.
n/a = not available
Values shown in italics represent adjusted data and are different from values shown in previous Corporate Responsibility Reports.